Wednesday, 1 March 2017

New UK texting and driving rules: Appropriate or too harsh?

texting and driving

Starting today, a new law has taken effect in England, Scotland, and Wales: New drivers with licenses obtained within the past two years will have their license revoked if caught using a mobile device while driving. The new law awards six points and a £200 fine on the first offense, with six points being all it takes for a driver to lose their license.

Mobile phones and driving have always had varying degrees of acceptance. The new law allows drivers to continue using phones hands-free – it just prohibits the driver from holding the phone in their hand, or even interacting with it physically, unless they are pulled over and the engine is turned off. Handheld use at red lights and other routine stops while the engine is running is also illegal. The only exception to the rule is if a driver needs to call emergency services and it is unsafe or impractical to stop.

More experienced drivers are affected by these laws as well, although not as harshly. Drivers who have had their license for longer than two years can have their license revoked if they rack up 12 points in three years.

An appropriate punishment or too severe?

An extensive effort has been made - especially in recent years with the evolution of smartphones – to create rules and regulations against mobile use while driving. Numerous studies, documentaries, commercials, and campaigns have been made in order to educate the public on just how dangerous our seemingly harmless mobile phones can be. Still, people choose to ignore these warnings for one reason or another.

It’s been my experience that bringing up the very real potential of causing an accident by “texting and driving” (which loosely translates to “using your smartphone and driving”) results in very little concern. Most people feel they are the exception to the rule. Typical responses I receive include that the person feels that they’re “good at texting and driving” or that “it will only take a moment”, or even flat out getting offended as if I were personally attacking their skills as a driver otherwise. Unfortunately, those arguments only work if you were the only one on the road, ever. Even then, you still risk your own safety because you have the unfortunate handicap of owning a human brain, which happens to think very highly of itself and often overestimates its ability to multitask effectively.

I’ve had a couple of experiences that I can recall where I’ve nearly been in an accident due to texting and driving. One occurred about a month ago. I was driving down a two-lane road, separated only by two solid, painted yellow lines. As my car was turning a corner, another car was also turning a corner in the opposite direction, but completely cut into my lane. Just before I swerved out of the way, I saw them toss their phone into the passenger seat as they scrambled to get back into their lane. As it turns out, double yellow lines don’t have a magic forcefield preventing cars from swerving into oncoming traffic; they only work when people pay attention.forcefield preventing cars from swerving into oncoming traffic; they only work when people pay attention.

Another instance occurred when I was younger, probably about 6 years ago. I was in the car with my best friend, who was driving, and we were at a stop light. She was texting. The light was still red, but she suddenly dropped her phone in her lap like a hot potato and began to drive, mistakenly thinking the light had turn green. She realized the light was still red in time to stop the car again, but her attempt at being acutely aware of what color the traffic light was while texting failed her. She almost drove into traffic that otherwise would have hit us head-on.

For whatever reason, death doesn’t always deter people from texting and driving. Whether it’s potentially causing harm or death to another person, or harm or death to oneself, a scary number of people seem to think they are the exception to the rule without realizing just how much can change in the “few moments” it takes to check the phone. Not only is your concentration focused elsewhere, but surprisingly enough the world is still carrying on outside of your speeding metal box on wheels.

texting and driving​

The UK’s new law, in my opinion, is a good one in theory. It doesn’t completely prohibit mobile use, but instead almost forces one (who appreciates having the ability to drive, that is) to use their phone more responsibly while driving. Maybe it will work; I think people could realistically imagine losing their licenses before realistically considering that they could die or kill somebody. Then again, maybe it won’t. Phone addiction is a very real problem we face today, but it’s a hard problem to tackle when it’s so widespread that phone use is as normal of an occurrence as anything. I also wonder what kind of evidence is needed to prove that somebody was, in fact, interacting with a phone. Not everybody holds their phone obviously straight out in front of their face, and not everybody glancing down for whatever reason is looking at their phone, so that is something worth considering.

But on the topic of texting and driving, there is no excuse. I’m as flawed as anybody. I rely on and use my smartphone for far too many things, if I’m being completely honest with myself, but the no-brainer exception for me is how it is used in the car. If I use my phone while driving, it’s for navigation or music, both which are set-up before I even start the car. After that, the phone isn’t in my sight. I go by audio only. In the case that something goes wrong with my route (as it sometimes does) I find a place to pull over and figure the situation out. I just have too much respect for my own life and other’s lives on the road to even consider my smartphone a priority. Given how widespread the problem has become over the years, despite active measures to prevent it, I’m convinced that self-driving cars will probably be the fastest resolution to the issue, although stricter laws, in my opinion, are welcome in the meantime.

Readers, what are your thoughts on this new law? Do you think that the new point system and rules for mobile use and driving is fair? Please share your comments with us in the comments below.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts http://ift.tt/2ldy9Qe
via IFTTT

OnePlus offering Android 7.1.1 beta update for OnePlus 3T and 3

OnePlus 3T Nougat update hands-on

After treating the OnePlus 3T and OnePlus 3 to an Android 7.0 update earlier this year, OnePlus is now prepping an even fresher Nougat update for those two phones.

OnePlus has announced Android 7.1.1 beta updates for the OnePlus 3T and OnePlus 3. These updates are available in open beta, meaning that anyone can give them a try right now.

If you’ve installed a previous Open Beta build from OnePlus, you’ll get this Android 7.1.1 update over the air. If you haven’t yet installed an Open Beta build, you can sideload this new update onto your device.

As for what’s included in the update, there’s a bump up to Android 7.1.1 as well as several photo gallery improvements and bug fixes. Here’s OnePlus’s official changelog for the update:

Key updates in this build:
Upgraded to Android 7.1.1
New Shot on OnePlus wallpaper option
Gallery Improvements

  • New photo editor with watermark and photo straightening options
  • Newly added media will be highlighted in Photos section
  • Image location will be displayed on grid view
  • Media can be grouped by month and year
  • Folders and individual media can be hidden

General bug fixes
Known Issues and Fixes
Android pay not able to work on London TFL/Tube

  • This can be resolved by updating the app via Play store

Compatability issues with certain third party apps

There’s no word on when this Android 7.1.1 update will roll out to the general public, but if you’re ok with running a beta build and living with some bugs, you can load 7.1.1 onto your OnePlus 3T or OnePlus 3 by hitting up the links below.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts http://ift.tt/2mLUu3J
via IFTTT

Spotify Hi-Fi feature in testing, offers lossless CD-quality streaming

Spotify iPhone app

Spotify has long offered high-quality 320kbps music streaming, but it looks like the service may soon roll out an even higher quality option.

Some Spotify users have been receiving notifications for a service called Spotify Hi-Fi. The alerts show that Spotify Hi-Fi includes all of the features of the standard Spotify Premium service as well as “Lossless CD quality audio.”

The notification also suggests that Spotify Hi-Fi members will get discounts on limited edition vinyl records as well as one free record.

Spotify Hi-Fi streaming

When it comes to pricing, different Spotify users have been given different prices for Hi-Fi. Some folks say that Spotify Hi-Fi costs an extra $5 per month on top of the $10 monthly Spotify Premium price, while some have gotten a $7.50 price and others have seen a $10 price increase.

Spotify hasn’t made any official announcements about this Hi-Fi service. In a statement to The Verge, Spotify said, “We are always testing new products and offers but have no news to share at this time.”

Spotify appears to be doing some testing for its Hi-Fi service, gauging interest in a higher-quality offering and trialling different prices to see what fits best. As for the service itself, most folks probably won’t be able to tell much of a difference when they’re just plugging their headphones into their smartphone to listen to some tunes.

There are likely some folks out there that have equipment (like a headphone amp) that could take advantage of higher-quality Spotify streams, though, and Spotify could make some extra money from those folks by offering this Hi-Fi service.

Do you have any interest in lossless music streams?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts http://ift.tt/2ld53k6
via IFTTT

Samsung Galaxy S8 leaks continue, new photo shows on-screen navigation buttons

Samsung Galaxy S8 leak on-screen buttons

Following last night's Galaxy S8 press render leak, some photos of Samsung’s next Android flagship have now surfaced.

A handful of photos that claim to show the Samsung Galaxy S8 have been leaked by BGR. Perhaps the most interesting one is the one you see above, which gives us a clear look at the GS8’s display and its on-screen navigation buttons, which are Recent Apps, Home, and Back, in that order.

The above photo also gives us another look at the Galaxy S8’s tall display with rounded corners. And on the sides, we can see the volume rocker, the power/lock button, and the button that’s rumored to give quick access to Bixby, Samsung’s new assistant.

Samsung Galaxy S8 photo leak side

The design of the Galaxy S8 is shaping up to be quite a bit different than its predecessors. Perhaps the biggest change is the lack of a home button, which Samsung has used not only in its past Galaxy S flagships, but in many of its other Galaxy smartphones. That also means that Samsung is adopting on-screen display buttons for the first time. And then there’s the taller 18:9 display and rounded screen corners, both of which are also new for the company.

Now that we’re starting to get some good looks at the Galaxy S8, what do you think of its design?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts http://ift.tt/2mLyRRn
via IFTTT

Hikvision Ezviz Mini Plus

As a subsidiary of Hikvision, one of the biggest names in CCTV, Ezviz is actually the smallest security camera we have come across. New to the UK, Ezviz is offering an easy way into the often murky world of home surveillance.

Instead of committing to a network of cameras and video storage, the Ezviz Mini Plus provides 24-hour visual cover of your property in a single diminutive IP camera. You can add more Mini cameras, of course, but there’s no commitment and with the choice of cloud video storage by subscription, or free local data dumping onto a microSD card, it’s an inexpensive option too.

Design and build

At just 5cm wide, this miniature IP camera is very discrete and easy to accommodate. It retails at £100 (around $125, AU$160) and comes in a choice of black, white, or pink so that it will blend with its surroundings. You can even turn the LED light off if you really don’t want it to be detected.

The device is made of plastic, but the metal stand feels stiff and well-constructed in its swivelling ball and socket joint. The base is magnetic for even easier installation, if you happen to have a metal surface in mind, while the supplied 3m USB cable that provides the power offers ample range.  

There’s no Ethernet port, however, so the camera must be sited within your Wi-Fi network. A word of warning: the base is rather weak in terms of its magnetism, which resulted in the camera falling on the floor when we tried attaching it to the side of the fridge. Double-sided stickers are also provided for a little extra traction.

Features

For such a small camera, the Mini Plus packs in a lot of features and some impressive specifications. The resolution is 1080p, unless you prefer to knock it down to 720p and preserve the bandwidth of your Wi-Fi network. With a 135-degree field of view, it’s possible to see almost all of any given room. It includes a microphone and speaker for two-way audio, an alarm sound when the motion sensor is triggered and IR night vision. 

The user-friendly companion app, a free download for iOS and Android devices, adds further functionality. As well as providing a setup wizard that joins the camera to your wireless network, it allows you to choose the motion sensitivity, volume levels, picture quality and the frequency or time of day that you prefer to receive push notifications.

What you don’t get is any kind of face, or even object, recognition, so a falling leaf is as likely to set off the alarm as a burglar if you have the motion sensitivity set too high. There’s no battery either and no Ethernet port, which means you are fully reliant on your Wi-Fi network.

Installation and use

Installation is made easy by the compact size of the camera, the long run of USB cable provided and the optional magnetic, or screw-fixing base plate. 

Getting the Ezviz Mini Plus online was even quicker, thanks to the helpful companion app that uses a QR code to join your phone with the camera more quickly. It’s a simple case of following the step-by-step instructions, and our camera logged on the first time we tried. 

Once connected, the Ezviz app shows you a picture of the last recording made and offers fairly intuitive access to all of the setup options and account management bits and bobs. It’s handled rather better than the clunky Foscam and D-Link apps, but it’s still a long way behind the polished Netatmo or Netgear software.

Performance

The video quality from this camera is very detailed in full light and certainly good enough for guard duty. That said, colours look inconsistent and the IR sensor tends to make the light levels fluctuate annoyingly in low light. Similarly, the audio quality is pretty awful, but it does the job and it’s surprising to find two-way audio at this price point at all. The alarm is horribly piercing, although that’s probably a good thing.

The motion sensor is particularly sensitive, but it can be adjusted within the menu, so you needn’t receive a message every time a fly buzzes past.

Verdict

We liked

The compact design is certainly convenient and unobtrusive, especially as you can choose between black and white finishes, and the setup procedure is very straightforward too. We’re also impressed by the 1080p specification, which captures plenty of detail, even if the colour balance and contrast are awry. 

The supporting app is well executed, making it fairly easy to adjust the notifications that are sent to your phone, and the sound alarm feature deserves more credit than it is given. Perhaps the best thing about the Ezviz Mini Plus is the way it offers both local video recording to microSD and a cloud subscription service. 

We disliked

The smooth plastic body of the camera looks as though it could be waterproof to some degree, but sadly, it isn’t. It also looks like there should be an integrated battery to make it truly wireless, but again, unfortunately there isn’t. There’s no Ethernet port either, which means you can only locate the camera within the bounds of your Wi-Fi network. 

We found the magnet in the base to be rather weak, and the picture quality is somewhat glitchy and unnatural even at 1080p resolution.

Final verdict

The Ezviz Mini Plus is a discrete and diminutive IP camera that’s simple to install and easy to use. And while it looks like an entry-level model, it’s actually a step up from the Ezviz Mini and offers 1080p resolution, adjustable motion sensitivity and a microSD card slot. It’s really only missing motion zone adjustment and object recognition.

The picture quality suffers from poor contrast, but offers high detail levels with reasonable night vision. However, it’s a pity there’s no internal battery and no integration with Nest, SmartThings, or HomeKit.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews http://ift.tt/2lTmh4L

ExpressVPN

ExpressVPN is a small British Virgin Islands-based provider of VPN services. The company's products are a little more expensive than most, from $12.95 (£10.50, AU$16.90) for a one-off month option to an effective $8.33 (£6.75, AU$10.90) if you pay for a year upfront.

On the plus side, you do get a lot for your money. We’re talking 145 locations in 94 countries, P2P support, along with custom clients for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, even Linux. You also get a lot of genuinely helpful web-based tutorials and troubleshooting guides, and 24/7 email and live chat support if you have problems. The service does limit you to three simultaneous connections while you might get five elsewhere, but otherwise it's very well specified.

There's no free plan or trial, but ExpressVPN's ‘no-hassle money-back guarantee’ is arguably better. You're able to try the full service for up to 30 days with no sneaky small-print restrictions on bandwidth or sessions, and if you still want a refund you can just email and ask. We tried this and there were no questions at all, just a quick acknowledgement the next day, and a full PayPal refund three days later.

If you like the service, ExpressVPN also has a simple referral scheme which can help reduce costs. Get a friend to sign up and provide your email address during the order process, and you both get a free month.

Privacy

ExpressVPN's privacy policy explains that the company doesn't "collect or log traffic data or browsing activity from individual users connected to our VPN".

There is a little session logging, with your connection dates, choice of server and total amount of data transferred all being recorded. ExpressVPN doesn't collect your connection times or IP addresses, though, so this can't be used to identify you.

Unusually, ExpressVPN's clients have a telemetry feature, enabled by default, which "may send diagnostic data to a third party analytics provider". But the company says "the information collected is generic in nature and does not contain personally identifying information", and if you don't want it anyway, the feature can be permanently disabled on installation with a single click.

The rest of ExpressVPN's small-print was very, very standard. The company stores basic information about you, but doesn't share it with anyone else, and the website uses cookies and third-party analytics, but then so does almost everybody else. It's all very normal and we saw no reason for any privacy concerns.

Performance

ExpressVPN does its very best to get you set up correctly, with easy-to-use apps for all your main devices, and an array of setup instructions for everything else (Apple TV, Kindle Fire, PlayStation, Xbox, MediaStreamer, and more).

Our PC client provided several ways to help choose a location. A Recommended tab highlights local and fast servers, and the Favourites tab lists recently-connected servers and any you've set as favourites, plus there’s the Location Picker which organises servers by continent, region and country.

This is all very simple and straightforward, but there are also a few extras hidden away, including a Speed Test module, diagnostics report, kill switch, and manual or automatic selection of protocol (OpenVPN, L2TP – IPSEC, PPTP, SSTP).

One issue we noticed immediately is the client gives very little feedback when it connects or disconnects. Other software displays pop-up alerts to let you know exactly when you're protected, but ExpressVPN only updates the taskbar button and system tray icon, and – depending on what you're doing – they might not always be visible. However, that's still enough to let you know what's happening, and some users might prefer ExpressVPN's quieter pop-up-free approach.

ExpressVPN achieved solid results in our performance tests*. UK-UK connections were fractionally lower than we expected at 25-30Mbps, but we achieved similar or higher rates with the French, Netherlands, German and Swedish servers. 

There was little change in UK-US traffic with downloads averaging 20-25Mbps, and even moving on to Pakistan (18Mbps) and Australia (15Mbps) gave us very acceptable speeds. There were one or two glitches – under 5Mbps downloads from South Africa, barely 1Mbps in Mongolia – but that's no surprise with this size of network, and performance overall was very good.

ExpressVPN completed the positive picture by doing well in our leak tests, with its DNS protection ensuring our identity was protected at all times.

Final verdict

ExpressVPN costs more than most VPNs, but then it also gives you more locations, more clients, along with more help and support if something goes wrong. If you value service quality more than price, take advantage of the money-back guarantee and check it out for yourself.

*Our testing included evaluating general performance (browsing, streaming video). We also used speedtest.net to measure latency, upload and download speeds, and then tested immediately again with the VPN turned off, to check for any difference (over several rounds of testing). We then compared these results to other VPN services we've reviewed. Of course, do note that VPN performance is difficult to measure as there are so many variables.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews http://ift.tt/2dVbq9a

Creative SoundBlasterX Katana

Why are there not more soundbars for desktops? If you have a pair of speakers, a regular-sized desk and perhaps a 24-inch monitor, it's likely that you're fighting for space. Cue the SoundBlasterX Katana, a soundbar for pairing with a PC monitor that creates 2.1 audio – using a separate, wired subwoofer – and offers a whopping 75W of power. 

Although a relatively rare genre, the Katana does have competitors, most notably the ageing Razer Leviathan and the even older XtremeMac Tango bar. This is the first soundbar for desktops that we've seen for a good few years. It's selling for US$299.99/UK£279.99/AUS$391. 

Design

The Katana has a robust build quality. Measuring 59cm long, it has two small feet beneath it, which creates about a centimetre of clearance between it and the desk. 

Cue a pleasant floating look, with the speaker angled slightly up towards the user. Audio-wise, that's an excellent design, while on each end there's a separate 7cm speaker grille that enables the Katana to project sound slightly to the sides. 

Despite its heavyweight feel and 1.5kg bulk, it looks super-sleek (save for an over-the-top brand logo), with a height of just 4.5cm, depth of 8cm, and a black, brushed aluminium finish. 

SoundBlasterX Katana

Set-up

Physically, the Katana is a little difficult to house on a desktop. Not because there's anything wrong with the main unit, but because the subwoofer must be tethered to the soundbar using a relatively short cable. 

It measures about two metres, which may sound like a lot, but once you've trailed a cable behind a desk and position the subwoofer in a convenient place, it's not enough. Ditto for the power cable for the sound bar itself, which links first to an external power pack, and then to a wall socket. 

If you were in any doubt that the Katana is meant primarily for desktops and not for living rooms, the ins and outs on its undercarriage make it clear. Back there you'll find a subwoofer connector alongside inputs for a microphone, a 3.5mm aux, an optical audio input, a USB slot (for USB audio), and a microUSB. 

Note that you could use this soundbar in your living room using optical or 3.5mm, or perhaps in a second room with a 26 inch TV (though it would suit a 32 inch TV just as well, size -wise). However, soundbars created for the living room typically use an HDMI input, which the Katana lacks. 

SoundBlasterX Katana Front

Performance

The chief reason why the Katana works well is that the user has to sit pretty close to it. Unlike a soundbar, which disperses sound all over a room with varying degrees of success, Katana's two tweeters, two mid-bass drivers, and one separate subwoofer do have its audience at close quarters. 

Cue some decent audio effects though the promised 7.1 virtual surround sound effects are nowhere to be heard. However, the overwhelming impression is one of volume. Serious volume. As in, far too much of it. We got no further than about 25% through its volume capabilities, having already reached deafening levels. Both game soundtracks and music is handled well, with plenty of mid-range and bass, though treble detail is its defining characteristic. 

It's got a DAC capable of 24-bit/96Hz lossless playback via USB or optical, so you can stream hi-res FLAC and WAV audio files. The clarity at close-quarters is impressive, with some exceptional detail demonstrated by what is as effectively an add-on PC soundcard. 

At the other end of the spectrum, even songs streamed from a phone over Bluetooth have pleasing breadth and treble detail. Overall, the subwoofer does OK, but can sound a little blunt. 

SoundBlasterX Katana Top

Verdict

Soundbars are hot, growing in sales by 15% every year, so it's no surprise that Creative is attempting to spread the love to the desktop by designing an 'under monitor audio system'. We're wondering why few other speaker and soundbar brands have tried it, because the Katana  proves a surprising success. 

We liked

Firstly, it saves a lot of space. Anyone with a relatively small desktop, especially those with a super-wide monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio who no longer have room for separate left/right speakers, is likely to be in short supply of space, and the 59cm-long, 4cm high slimness of the Katana does come in handy. 

If its sleek build quality isn't alluring enough, the Katana arrives in a box covered in pictures of the Northern Lights. 

Initially, we found this quite amusing, figuring that Creative thought a nice picture of a magnetic storm might increase sales. However, it soon became clear that it sports a rather nifty RGB light show. 

Now, it's nothing like a Northern Lights display, obviously, and nor does it even match-up to the colours spewed by a Philips Ambilight TV, but an LED button on the remote toggles between various light modes, one of which is for a rainbow of colours (16.8 million, to be exact) that gently projects downwards onto the desk. It subtly changes, and covers the whole spectrum of colours, and is really rather nice when the lights are off. 

We disliked

It's not cheap, and nor is it good for the living room despite its stunning volume levels. Why? There's just no surround sound – it just about manages some stereo separation – so the Katana probably isn't going to hugely impress in a big room. 

Although the subwoofer is relatively slim (at 13x30x30 cm) and passive, so doesn't need wiring-up to anything but the soundbar itself, it would be much better if it was wireless. 

However, it's a little blunt for ultimate sound quality. The least impressive part of the Katana is the tiny 8x4cm remote; it's the kind of remote you expect with a throwaway no-name gadget. 

Final verdict

It's sleek, it's powerful – perhaps too powerful – and it's got Bluetooth. If anything, the Katana leaves you wanting not more, but less, with its volume and bass levels potentially a little overwhelming at close-range on a desktop. 

However, that extra oomph gives the Katana a deserved place perhaps not in a living room, but certainly next to 32-inch TV in a second room or bedroom. That said, with only 2.1 sound, at its core the Katana is best thought of as a powerful and space-saving upgrade for PC games and music alike. 



from TechRadar: Technology reviews http://ift.tt/2lbKHrD

Google Home

Update: UK users who've been waiting patiently for Google Home won't have much longer to wait. The company has just confirmed that it expects to bring the speaker to the UK before the end of June. 

It’s hard finding a good roommate. Some leave dishes in the sink. Others stiff you on rent. But Google, or more specifically, the Google Assistant, isn’t like that at all. Everything considered and as far as roommates go, it’s actually one of the best you’ll ever have.

That’s because Google Assistant, the smart artificial intelligence that’s built into the Google Home, actually makes life easier rather than more difficult for you. 

You can ask it to lower the thermostat for you when you leave, diagnose your symptoms when you’re feeling ill or have it locate that funny clip from Colbert last night and throw it onto your Chromecast without any backsass or hesitation. 

It’s smart enough to tell you how much plane tickets cost from where you live to any exotic destination you can think of, or prattle off oddly specific information like how much a Macaw weighs (2.6 to 3.3 pounds, apparently) or how much a new piece of technology costs (“According to TechRadar, the PlayStation 4 Pro costs $399 or £349”). 

But, ask that very same question using different words or in a slightly different tone, and Google’s ultra-smart assistant suddenly forgets what it just told you. 

That general problem – ”it works sometimes but not all the time” – isn’t just symptomatic of the $129 (around £100, AU$170) Google Home; the Amazon Echo, the current smart home incumbent, is far from immune to them as well. In due time, both devices will get smarter, but as it stands both are more novelty than pragmatic purchases. 

That said, if a few misfires and unanswered inquiries don’t scare you off, Google Home offers an interesting proposition for you: a smart home hub, a virtual assistant and a decent Wi-Fi speaker, all rolled into a device that’s shaped like an air freshener.

Design

Now, because “air freshener” can be a varied description depending on where you are in the world, a more apt description of its shape might be a small vase – it has a wide bottom and a tapered top. Each Google Home comes with a standard, gray fabric base with a rubber bottom that can be swapped out for a different material or color for around $20. 

So far, Google offers two types of bases to match your home decor: metallic and fabric, each with different colors and finishes. Metallic bases are made out of either painted steel or polycarbonate and come in copper, snow or carbon colors. On the fabric side, the three colors are mango, marine and violet, in addition to the standard white mesh listed above. 

From a pure aesthetic point of view, Google Home is the far more attractive option when compared to the Amazon Echo’s all-black canister shape. It’s less ominous than the black monolith and it’s also a fair bit shorter at 5.62 x 3.79 inches (142.8 x 96.4mm; H x D), which means it’s easier for the Home to blend into its surroundings.

There’s also some function to this form, however. The top, flat, inclined surface of the Google Home acts as a touch-capacitive panel, allowing you to change the volume, play and pause the music or activate the Google Home assistant with a tap. Once activated either by pressing the top panel or saying the wake word (“OK Google” or “Hey Google”), four multi-colored lights twist and whirl to indicate that you’ve caught its attention. 

While Google Home generally does a good job picking up your voice thanks to the two built-in microphones located on the top half of the chassis, it doesn’t work 100% of the time. You’ll definitely end up repeating yourself or raising your voice to get its attention more times while using Google Home than you would with an Amazon Echo. 

Uncap the bottom base and you’ll find a speaker and two passive radiators, which, considering the sheer volume the little device can put out, is impressive. The Amazon Echo has a few more speakers inside its chassis, and can therefore sound a bit better at higher volumes, however what’s under the hood here is enough to get the job done.

Audio performance and Google Cast

While Google Assistant, the voice and smarts inside the speaker, might be the main attraction here, Google Home is actually a pretty capable audio device as well. 

It can access all sorts of streaming services – Google Play Music, YouTube Music, Spotify and Pandora – and works as a Wi-Fi speaker thanks to its built-in Google Cast capabilities. 

What that means in practice is that you’ll be able to ask it to play nearly any song you can think of, and it will either find it on Google Play Music’s 30-million-plus catalogue or, if you’ve taken it up on its free trial offer, pull it up YouTube Music. Think about that for a second. Unlimited access to music on YouTube? Yeah, by far and away, Google Home probably has the largest song library of any audio device on the market. 

We tried for an hour to find a song that Google Home couldn’t pull up – recalling some seriously obscure music, like the theme song from 1998’s Banjo-Kazooie game on N64 to the title track for Requiem for a Dream – to no avail. Of course, you’ll likely stumble across something that Google Home can’t find, but the fact that we couldn’t stump it after arming ourselves with dozens of songs is absolutely unheard of.

It’s just too bad the expansive library of songs is stuck – for the most part – inside a less-than-amazing-sounding speaker.

 Compared to Bluetooth speakers in its price range like, say, the Creative Sound Blaster Roar 2 or Razer Leviathan Mini, music on the Google Home comes off as less robust with little separation and little punch on the low-end or clarity in the mids and highs. 

Now, it’s not completely incapable for playing decent-sounding music – it does have some bass and some mids – but, if you’re expecting Google Home to replace your Hi-Fi setup, you’ll be severely disappointed. (Audiophiles, keep in mind that a vast majority of the time Google Home sources its music from YouTube, a site infamous for its audio compression.)

But Google Home makes up for its less-than-pristine audio quality with a feature that other speakers don’t have, and that’s its ability to both receive and send Google Cast signals, making it the only audio device that can not only stream music from your phone, but send video streams to any Google Cast-compatible connected devices as well.

There are few better indications that we’re living in the future than saying “OK Google, play the latest episode of Clueless Gamer on Chromecast” and having Conan O’Brien appear on your TV. But, moreover, it’s this ability to connect to Google Cast-enabled devices that give Google Home the expandability it will need for years to come.

Google Home as the center of your smart home

Of course, Chromecast isn’t the only device that Google Home can talk to. There are a half-dozen devices that can hook into Google Home right now, or will be able to do so soon. (We’ve compiled a list of the best Google Home smart home devices so you don’t have to waste time tracking each one down.) 

The highlights of what Google Home can connect to right now are Nest thermostats, Philips Hue lightbulbs and Samsung’s SmartThings platform, while support for even more third-party devices like LIFX lightbulbs and LG MusicFlow speakers should be coming soon. 

Once more devices support Google Home it will truly begin to feel like the open ecosystem we’ve come to expect from the Mountain View-based company, but so far it feels a bit like a walled garden with just a few smart home device options to pick from. 

 That said, what’s here is enough to get a good jump on building your smart home hub – a thermostat to control the temperature, a slew of lights that can be turned on and off with a few words and Samsung SmartThings, one of the largest players in the space right now.

But while integration with hardware is nice, the largest problem Google Home faces is that it can’t integrate with many of Google’s own services, some of which have been its bread and butter for years. 

Take Gmail, for instance. You’d think Google Home might be able to rattle off the subjects of your top 10 emails – but, surprise, it can’t. The same goes for Google Calendar where it’s unable to create new events, make phone calls with Google Voice or jot down some quick notes in a Google Doc. Google has a dozen services that the Home should be able to link into and yet, in its current state, simply cannot.

And while it’s easy to hammer this point home and point out all Google Home’s shortcomings in one long winded tirade, we’re not going to. That’s not because we’re avoiding the harsh criticism or defending the Home, we’re not. 

But we’ve already fallen into that trap of being overly critical of a smart platform once before with Amazon Echo, and since then it has flourished into an amazingly smart, connected platform that can answer hundreds more questions than it could two short years ago. It can order pizza or restock the refrigerator or call an Uber or check what time a restaurant closes, and the list of everything it can do grows week over week. 

Google Home can do some of that already, making it far and away a better system now than the Echo was when it first launched. Some of that it can’t. But, speaking from experience, it’s only going to get better, smarter and more robust in the coming weeks, months and years.

We liked

One thing’s for sure: You might never appreciate just how much music is on YouTube without buying a Google Home. While some of the biggest music streaming services in the world boast libraries of 25, 30 and even 40 million songs, they’re far from complete. We’re not saying Google Home is capable of playing any song you can think of, but after dredging the depths of the ’90s we still couldn’t find a tune Google Home couldn’t find.

And while Google Home excels as a DJ, it’s also a surprisingly intelligent smart home hub. It already hooks into some of the largest platforms now by including Nest, Philips and Samsung’s SmartThings, and given a few months that number will grow even more.

We disliked

Clearly the lack of integration into Google’s own services is a huge issue. The fact that it can’t shoot an email to someone in your contacts or help you schedule events through Google Calendar are massive oversights that vastly reduce how useful the Home could be.

The other problem with Google Assistant is how precise you have to be when asking your questions. Asking what year a song was written might not turn up any results, while asking what year a song was released might unveil the exact answer you were looking for. Follow up any inquiry with a simple request like “OK Google, tell me more about it” and it suddenly forgets what you’ve been talking about for the past 30 seconds. 

Admittedly, this lack of contextual awareness isn’t something that Alexa deals with – which is surprising considering that the Echo doesn’t come from the company with 20-plus years of search engine experience.

Final verdict

It’s easy to feel disappointed with Google Home when you buy one and expect it to be the coveted center of the smart home Google has marketed it as. It’s just not there yet. It’s a bit too rigid in its language comprehension, its list of smart home devices is growing but still a bit underwhelming in number and, perhaps the biggest disappointment of all, it doesn’t have many of Google’s core services built into it.

The best comparison for Google Home, obviously, is the Amazon Echo. They both have identical functions, draw music from the same sources and are stumped, largely, by the same set of questions. And while the Echo is still the more formidable of the two thanks to the dozens of developers who have created bespoke commands, the Home is – at worst – about six months behind in development. 

Given the same attention from hardware and software developers and some of those additional Google services, the Home could quickly grow from a nascent smart speaker with Chromecast integration to the first and most critical piece of the ever-expanding smart home. 

For now, however, the Google Home is simply a smart novelty with access to YouTube Music, built-in Google Cast and the ability to save you a trip to the light switch. 



from TechRadar: Technology reviews http://ift.tt/2giBuvi
Back to top ↑
Connect with Us

What they says

© 2013 techmobile. WP Mythemeshop Converted by Bloggertheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.