Wednesday 31 October 2018

Honor Magic 2 features a slider design and six total cameras

Honor Magic 2 slider design official

Days after Xiaomi introduced its Mi Mix 3 with a sliding form factor, another phone has been revealed that adopts the slider design in order to avoid the notch.

The Honor Magic 2 is now official, and it offers a sliding form factor that houses three front-facing cameras. There's a 16MP main camera and a two additional 2MP cameras, and combining those three cameras, you can get 3D facial recognition, portrait lighting, beautification, and bokeh.

Around on the back of the Honor Magic 2 is another triple rear camera setup, giving the phone a total of six cameras. There's a 16MP RGB camera here along with a 24MP monochromatic sensor and a 16MP ultra wide angle camera.

Inside the Magic 2's sliding shell is a Kirin 980 processor, just like in the flagship Huawei Mate 20, up to 8GB of RAM, and up to 256GB of storage. The screen is a 6.39-inch 2340x1080 AMOLED panel that has an in-display fingerprint sensor for added security, and there's a 3500mAh battery powering the whole package. Honor has also included dual SIM slots, NFC, and Android 9.0 Pie.

The Honor Magic 2 will come in three colors — red, blue, and black — each with a gradient design that we've seen on a few different devices lately. The phone is now available for pre-order in China, and pricing starts at 3799 yuan ($545 USD) for the 6GB/128GB model and goes up to 4799 yuan ($688 USD) for the 8GB/256GB version.

Honor's new Magic 2 looks like an interesting device. The sliding form factor lets you get the edge-to-edge screen look that so many device makers are after lately, and its spec list isn't too shabby either. Unfortunately, Honor tells us that the Magic 2 isn't currently slated to make its way to the U.S. Now that we're seeing more devices with the sliding form factor, though, hopefully one of them will make its way stateside.

What do you think of the Honor Magic 2? Are you a fan of its sliding design?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2CTKwZm
via IFTTT

Top 10 iOS Apps of October 2018!

We've compiled a top 10 list of our favorite iOS apps to hit the App Store in October 2018. The apps highlighted in this video include Hawkeye Access, Zodiask, SHUMP, Adobe Premiere Rush CC, Cove, Golf Battle, Focus, Filterious, Jumprope, and Pivot Pop. Which app is your favorite?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2QbOLDp
via IFTTT

LG may show foldable smartphone at CES 2019

LG CES booth

Samsung may not be the only major smartphone manufacturer that shows off a foldable device in the near future.

LG is planning to introduce a foldable phone during its CES 2019 keynote, according to well-known leaker Evan Blass. When asked about this rumor, Ken Hong, LG's head of global corporate communications, told Digital Trends that LG doesn't comment on rumors or speculation. But when pressed, Hong said, "Anything is possible at CES."

CES runs from January 8-11, so we may only be a couple of months away from meeting LG's foldable phone. Unfortunately, no details about the device are known, save for its foldability.

Way back in January 2018, we learned that LG filed for a couple of patents related to a foldable smartphone design. The first showed a phone that could be unfolded to show a large screen and when folded up, it could display info on its backside. The second design was similar, with a large screen that can be folded to into a smaller size, but when folded it would show a portion of that screen for displaying time and other info.

Does the concept of a foldable smartphone interest you?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2qtLB2Z
via IFTTT

Asus Chromebook Flip

We’ve been kicking the idea of the premium Chromebook around for a while now. However, until the Asus Chromebook Flip came around, we never saw this concept so fully realized. We could go on all day about where early Chromebooks faltered, but there’s no need – the Asus Chromebook Flip is everything we want in a premium Chromebook.

It’s not quite as performant as the excellent Google Pixelbook, but it doesn’t actually need to be – it’s half the price and not that far off when it comes to performance. This attention to value, without sacrificing performance is exactly what makes the Asus Chromebook Flip so appealing.

What’s more, the Asus Chromebook Flip has a 360-degree hinge that has it ‘flip’ inside out – hence the name. At 12.5 inches and 2.6 pounds, the Asus Chromebook Flip isn’t just ‘good for a Chromebook’, it’s one of the best laptops period – depending on what you’re looking for. 

Pricing and availability

We wouldn’t blame you for doing a double take after seeing the price of the Asus Chromebook Flip. Before the Black Friday and Cyber Monday deals, it comes in at $499 or £599 (about AU$650), which is pricey compared to a lot of other Chromebooks. After all, half a grand could get you a serviceable Windows laptop. However, value comes down to taste, and you could cut some corners on storage and processing power for $449 or £499 and get a slightly toned-down version of the Asus Chromebook Flip.

An equally powerful HP Chromebook 13 will set you back $619 or £590 (about AU$800) with half as much onboard storage, but a sharper QHD display. Meanwhile, the enterprise-oriented Acer Chromebook 14 for Work runs for $499 (about £372, AU$650) with an Intel Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM and 32GB of flash storage.

The C302’s biggest rival is the Samsung Chromebook Plus, which undercuts it at $449 (about £360, AU$590) with an ARM processor, sharper 2,400 x 1,600 screen and a built-in stylus. What’s more, Samsung’s latest Chrome OS machine is also available in a Pro SKU that plops on the same Intel Core m3 chip for $549 (about £440, AU$720).

Of course, there are more affordable Chromebook options. The $399 or £399 (about AU$665), Acer Chromebook R13 also comes in a convertible form factor with a Full HD screen, though, its 2.1GHz quad-core processor doesn’t hail from Intel, but rather MediaTek.

Design

Like the original Asus Chromebook C100 before it, the C302 is built from an all-aluminium chassis, though, this time it has an anodized finish rather than a brushed texture. Overall, it has a clean, no nonsense aesthetic and it folds up to a nearly symmetrical slab of metal.

Thankfully, the original Chromebook C100’s long, bar-shaped hinge has been dropped for the ZenBook Flip UX360’s multi-gear, metal mechanism. The smaller, two-piece mechanism makes this machine feel like less of a toy while helping it to blend in as a regular notebook.

Overall, the Asus Chromebook Flip looks and feels like any other unibody laptop inspired by the MacBook Pro in the last decade. However, its rounded corners, straight edges and 0.9 inch (2.29cm) thin frame all add up to a slick design rivaling HP and Google’s most premium model at a much lower price.

Weighing in at 2.6 pounds (1.19kg), the C302 is one of the lightest Chromebooks, beating out the 2.86-pound (1.3kg) HP Chromebook 13. It’s also one of the first convertible Chrome OS machines you’ll actually want to use in tablet mode, unlike the 3.3-pound (1.5kg) Acer Chromebook R13.

Aside from being lighter, the C302 seems to have been specifically designed for tablet use. Asus has come up with a clever magnetic clasp that pulls the screen lid tight against the underside of the notebook. It’s an ingenious addition that helps the 2-in-1 Chromebook feel like one solid device rather than a foldable electronic, and we’re surprised this solution hasn’t come sooner.

When you’re not using the C302 as a tablet, it falls back on a solid keyboard that makes it as familiar and comfortable as any traditional laptop. The keys offer a satisfying 1.4mm of crisp key travel that we’ve missed in a world of ever-slimmer notebooks.

As for the trackpad, we can really only say it exists. It offers accurate tracking, but without any multitouch features but two-finger scrolling, there’s nothing noteworthy about it.

Android apps on tap

Having a usable tablet mode is becoming ever more common in Chrome OS devices as Google has steadily increased the platform’s Android integration. Unfortunately, the C302 does not come with access to the Play Store right out of the box, and we had to switch over onto Chrome OS beta channel in order to download apps. 

Other than that small hiccup, the hybrid Chromebook is fully equipped to drive right into the Android ecosystem. We swiped and tapped into our favorite apps just as we would on any Google tablet. To our surprise, the hybrid Chromebook is also outfitted with gyroscopes, allowing us to play motion-controlled games like Asphalt 8.

Unfortunately, not everything about running Android apps is perfect. Slack and many other important apps we typically use on an smartphone don’t scale properly on Chromebooks, leaving us with tiny text on certain apps, and the Kindle app isn’t able to display full screen in portrait orientation.

Mobile apps also are designed with a touchscreen interface in mind, and sometimes this doesn’t play well with the touchpad and keyboard setup of the C302. Of course, it’s easy enough to switch the hybrid to tablet mode.

We chalk these issues to the beta version of Chrome OS, which fixed some problems and introduced new ones during the course of our review. 

However, despite these issues, we don’t miss the days of sorting through the beleaguered Chrome Web Store full of knockoff apps and games. Though it’s only in beta, having access to the Play Store grants us access to so many more useful programs on the Asus Chromebook Flip.

We love using Android apps in tablet mode just as much as sitting down with the C302 as a traditional Chromebook for long browsing and writing sessions. The hybridization of Google’s two platforms also finally lets us use mobile apps alongside the staple elements of Chrome OS.

First reviewed November 2017

Performance

Intel Core M-series CPUs might just be the perfect part to power Chromebooks, as they offer more performance than your average Celeron chip while being more efficient. And that’s just not just us saying that: the benchmark results back us up here.

The C302, with its Core m3 processor, performs nearly twice as fast as the Dell Chromebook 13 with a Celeron processor. That said, this hybrid doesn’t quite have the gusto to keep up with the Intel Core i5-powered Acer Chromebook 14 for Work or the Core m5 chip inside HP Chromebook 13, though it’s only a quarter less power.

Numbers aside, the 2-in-1 Chromebook performs admirably even with two open Chrome windows with 12 open tabs each. Along with our heavy browsing habits, we also had Google Music playing in the background and the Slack Android app open.

Optimal performance

Chromebooks are known for having long battery life, and the Asus Chromebook Flip is a great example. In fact, it’s the longest-lasting premium Chromebook we’ve used – it ran for a whopping 10 hours and 46 minutes on our standard local movie playback test.

By comparison, the Acer Chromebook 14 ended its run an hour and 10 minutes earlier, and the HP Chromebook 13 only managed to last for just a minute over eight hours.

With our typical workload, the Asus Chromebook Flip ran just shy of hitting the eight hour, all-day battery life mark. However, any combination of running fewer tasks, turning off the keyboard backlight or lowering the display’s brightness would dramatically increase battery life with this Chromebook.

Screen and speakers

Although the Asus Chromebook Flip C302 only rocks a 1,920 x 1,080 display, FHD is really all you need on a 12.5-inch screen. It’s not as sharp as the QHD HP Chromebook 13, but the lower pixel count affords two more hours of battery life – a trade off we would gladly take.

Still, text and photos remain crisp and the C302 resolves strong colors, which is exactly what we want to see in a companion device to flip through e-comics and online video. Average contrast levels – dark pixels often falling off to deep blacks – is the only weak point of the display but it’s still better than most Chromebooks, and we prefer this to seeing muddy grays.

Audio-wise, the Chromebook Flip’s speakers are loud, but lack much nuance to really appreciate music. There’s also a slight hint of tininess that limits how high you can set the volume before it’s unbearable, so plug in a pair of headphones if you’re looking to rock out.

We liked

From top to bottom, the Asus Chromebook C302 is our most favorite Chromebook yet. It meets high standards set by the HP Chromebook 13 and other premium Chrome OS machine with a classy design and high-spec parts – yet it does all of this at a lower price.

We disliked

Our only legitimate complaint about this hybrid Chrome OS machine is it’s mediocre speakers, but it’s an issue we take with 80% of laptops. In other transitory problems, we wished Android app integration would have been more seamless, but for now, it’s an ongoing process. We’re sure Google will add Play store access to a stable Chrome OS build for this particular Chromebook as it has with others in the past.

Final verdict

If you’ve been on the fence about buying a premium Chromebook, this one has 100 reasons (read: dollars, pounds … you get it) to make you jump for it. Although it isn’t a huge price difference, the Asus Chromebook Flip C302 rises to its premium stature with a gorgeous screen and a better keyboard than you would find on some Ultrabooks.

This is the first Chromebook that actually feels as comfortable to use as a tablet as it is a traditional laptop. While the Samsung Chromebook Pro almost makes this version pointless with its sharper screen and built-in stylus, we have yet to see how it performs. For now, the Asus Chromebook Flip C302 is king of the Chrome OS hill and it’s still worth your time, even in 2018. 



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2kwTweu

Microsoft Surface Book

Did you know the Surface Book isn’t Microsoft’s latest flagship 2-in-1 laptop? No, that honor goes to the new, and now more affordable, Microsoft Surface Book 2 – now, read our Surface Book 2 review!

When the Surface Book, well, surfaced back in October 2015, it made massive waves in the computing world. Now, three years later, it’s not hard to see the massive influence the original Surface Book had on the best 2-in-1 laptops.

And, because the Surface Book 2 is such a premium laptop, the original Surface Book will be holding a dedicated fan base well into the future. It’s an enduring device that, with a constant flow of updates – like the Windows 10 October 2018 Update – has been growing and evolving since day one.

All you need to do is just look at the Surface Book, and you’ll know it’s an expensive device – but it’s worth it. The original Surface Book justifies its high price tag due to the fact that it’s essentially two devices in one, with an incredibly sharp 3,000 x 2,000 display, competent 6th-generation Intel processor and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 940M graphics card. We’d even go so far as to praise the controversial dynamic fulcrum hinge – even if it’s not quite of the same quality as the Surface Book 2’s hinge. 

Price and availability

The Surface Book 2 may have a lower starting price than it did upon release, now at $1,199 (£1,149, AU$2,199), but these days you can get the original Surface Book for even less – especially with Black Friday and Cyber Monday lurking around the corner. Of course, you’re not going to find it brand new on store shelves these days, but a refurbished Surface Book is still a Surface Book – and, really, that’s enough for us.

If you go on Amazon, you can expect to save hundreds of dollars when compared to similarly specced Surface Book 2 devices without losing too much performance – and retaining the fantastic form-factor.

Still, the Microsoft Surface Book stands out for more than its spec sheet. It’s the 2-in-1 convertible design that attracts the masses. While the Huawei MateBook X Pro might have you feeling seduced with its bezel-less design, the Surface Book is much more versatile with the detachable screen and native stylus support necessary to make it such an undeniable catch. Plus, it’s cheaper, even if it doesn’t have a webcam hiding under its F6 key. 

Surface Book

Design

If a tear in the space-time continuum were to suddenly rip open, two things would fall out: the Terminator and then the Surface Book quickly tumbling to the Earth behind it. From the snake-like hinge, the flat design and even down to the washed-out silver color of this laptop, everything about it just seems like it came from the future.

Milled from two solid blocks of magnesium, the Surface Book feels sturdy and has a most minimalistic style unto its own.

From keyboard deck to the palm rests, the entire interior of the Surface Book is one flat surface of metal, except for the large space reserved for the glass touchpad. Likewise, the screen is made of one uninterrupted slate of magnesium, with its only extra flourishes being a mirror finished Windows logo in the center and a rear-facing camera.

Along the chiseled sides, you'll find two flat edges that start from the top of the display and terminate at the tip of the palm rest. That's not the only seamless transition.

Unlike most other convertible devices, the screen and base sections share nearly the same thickness and weight. Without the foreknowledge that the display can actually detach, the Surface Book looks like one continuous device, thanks to the hinge.

Surface Book

Mind the gap

At the midpoint of the Surface Book, there's a piece of connective tissue that Microsoft calls the dynamic fulcrum hinge. Rather than simply bonding the screen and keyboard base together, it's this key piece that makes the whole device work.

Rather than folding flatly, like a normal laptop, the dynamic fulcrum hinge coils into itself, leaving a noticeable gap between the screen and keyboard when its closed. When opened, this same hinge rolls out and actually extends the base of the laptop, which in turn helps extend the support base for the tablet portion of the Surface Book (called the Clipboard).

While a traditional notebook display might weigh half a pound at most, the top section of the Surface Book weighs 1.6-pounds, because it contains all the necessary parts to act as a standalone tablet. As such, the hinge has been reinforced and contains extra mechanisms, not unlike the Lenovo Yoga 900's watchband-style hinge to keep it in place.

Surface Book is solid as a rock, and you can even pick up it by the display and shake it about without worrying about the whole thing falling apart. On a flat surface, the screen is held steady in place and even stays put when you have it in your lap.

The only times we got the screen to move were when we tried poking the Surface Book with the Surface Pen, but that really comes from trying to operate a touchscreen on a laptop. Fortunately, the hinge on the Surface Book 2 is a lot sturdier – but it’s much more expensive. Other than that, the strikingly similar design carries on to the Surface Book’s sequel.

To alleviate some of the worries about the gap in the middle of the system – yes, there’s a large open space right in the middle when it’s closed. No, dust and other bits of nasty gunk won’t slip into the interior anymore than with a standard laptop, unless you’re an especially messy person. After a week of using the Surface Book day-in and day-out, we were able to run our finger against the inside hinge and not find a single speck of dust.

Another plus side of having a laptop that doesn’t close completely flush is that you don’t need to worry about oily outlines of the keyboard appearing on the screen. It’s a design element that also eliminates the need to seat the keyboard into a recessed area. Rather, the keys stand at attention above the keyboard deck.

The keyboard itself offers a splendid 1.6mm of key travel that caps off with a satisfying thwack when you bottom out the keys. The trackpad is just as pleasing, with its glass-laminated surface. For the first time ever, we found ourselves using three-finger multi gestures to rotate through windows and reveal the desktop.

While this is a tiny element of the Surface Book, few – if any – other Windows notebooks on the market today offer such a tight tracking experience.

Mobilizing the desktop

The Surface Book’s other trademark feature is the screen, which can pop off the base with the tap of a button. Now, Microsoft was technically late to the 2-in-1 laptop game with other devices able to perform similar actions, including the Acer Switch family, Toshiba’s Click notebooks, some HP devices – the list goes on.

However, Microsoft was the first to make a system as seamless as the Surface Book.

Undocking and attaching the Clipboard is nearly as seamless as the Surface Book's design. After either pressing the eject button on the keyboard or the virtual button in the taskbar, the screen will blink off for a second and then notify you it's safe to detach the screen with one quick tug.

Surface Book

It's fast and simple, however, the timing takes a little getting used to. After you get the prompt to detach the screen, you have to wait for about half a second before you can actually lift the display off its base.

Another unique feature to this notebook is it's the first to integrate a discrete graphics processor, or GPU, into a hybrid system. Tucked underneath the keyboard is a customized Nvidia GeForce GPU that makes this laptop just a bit more capable with media production and gaming.

We've seen this sort of GPU docking technology before in machines like the MSI GS30 Shadow with GamingDock and Alienware's GPU Amplifier solution. Microsoft has improved upon dockable graphics, as the Surface Book just needs a short moment to disengage the extra parts, whereas both the Alienware and MSI solutions require the laptop to reboot completely.

Surface Book

It's a neat feature that allows us to quickly show a friend something cool or when we want to read a digital comic book without having to lug the whole laptop around. But it didn't really click with us until we realized how easily it allows us to bring our entire PC to another place without having to disconnect our external monitor, keyboard, mouse, Xbox controller and all our other peripherals at home

It's the coolest mechanic since the saucer separation of the Enterprise-D. What's more, it leaves open a door to expandability. Because the Clipboard is compatible with all Surface Book keyboard bases, not just the one it shipped with, Microsoft could theoretically come out with future upgrades could be done through new bases. (Or maybe even a desktop rig that interfaces with the display? We can dream.) 

First reviewed: October 2015

Bill Thomas and Gabe Carey have also contributed to this review

With a starting weight of 3.34 pounds (1.51kg), the Surface Book is one of the heaviest 13-inch laptops. And that's without the optional, discrete GPU, which ends up adding a few extra ounces and bumps up this laptop's total weight to 3.48 pounds (1.58kg). While this might look like a lot on paper for an Ultrabook-class device, consider the 13-inch MacBook Pro weighs just as much despite it packing a smaller screen, no dedicated GPU and fewer batteries. For a closer look at how the two devices compare, check out our Microsoft Surface Book vs Apple MacBook Pro versus article.

If you're looking for the power of a discrete GPU in an Apple device, you'll have to go all the way up to a high-end 15-inch MacBook Pro. And this is a machine that is significantly heavier (4.49 pounds or 2.04kg) and larger (14.13 x 9.73 x 0.71 inches or 359 x 247 x 18mm).

Surface Book

Thanks to its 3:2 aspect ratio and having a 13.5-inch screen, the Surface book is quite a bit taller than your average 13-inch laptop. Despite its peculiar 12.3 x 9.14 x 0.51-0.90 inches or 312 232 x 13-22.8 mm (W x D x H) dimensions, I had no problem slipping this laptop into bags designed to hold a traditional 13.3-inch laptop.

The Dell XPS 13 comes as the antithesis to the Surface Book in its mission to be the smallest 13-inch laptop in the world, weighing in at 2.8 pounds (1.27kg) while measuring 11.98 x 7.88 x 0.6 inches (304mm x 200 x 15mm).

Surface Book

Spec sheet

Here is the configuration for the Microsoft Surface Book techradar reviewed:

  • Processor: 2.4GHz Intel Core i5-6300U (dual-core, 3MB cache, up to 3GHz with Turbo Boost)
  • Graphics: Intel HD graphics 520; Nvidia GeForce graphics (1GB GDDR5 high-speed memory)
  • RAM: 8GB
  • Screen: 13.5-inch, 3,000 x 2,000 (267 ppi) PixelSense Display
  • Storage: 256GB PCIe3.0 SSD
  • Ports: 2 x USB 3.0, mini DisplayPort, SD card reader, mini headphone/mic combo jack
  • Connectivity: 802.11ac 2x2 MIMO Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0 LE
  • Camera: Windows 8MP rear-facing auto-focus camera (1080p HD), 5MP front-facing Hello face-authentication camera (1080p HD)
  • Weight: 3.48 pounds (1.58kg)
  • Size: 12.3 x 9.14 x 0.51-0.90 (W x D x H) (312 x 232 x 13-22.8 mm)

Surface Book

With an $1,899 or AU$2,949 (about £1,239) price tag for the configuration above, the Surface Book asks for a pretty penny that's typically reserved for high-end gaming notebooks. And that's even applicable to the $1,499 or AU$2,299 (about £978) price associated with its most basic configuration, which is essentially a more expensive Surface Pro 4.

Not just a joke either, Microsoft's two Surface devices shares very similar standard specs including the same processor, storage space and memory allotment. However, there are several key differences, as Microsoft's first laptop possess a larger screen and a completely different design. It's for this reason, it makes sense to either throw in an extra couple of dollars in the hole to get the $1,699, US-only unit with discrete graphics and 128GB of storage space.

If you want to go whole hog on Microsoft's hybrid, you could also pick up a 1TB configuration that comes with an Intel Core i7 CPU, a discrete GPU and 16GB of RAM for $3,199 – but again, unfortunately, this is a US-only configuration.

Surface Book

The well-equipped, Skylake-powered Dell XPS 13 can be had for $1,649 (£1,149, $2,499). While it does not come with a discrete graphics chip, the XPS 13 has a leg up on the Surface book with a 3,200 x 1,800 resolution display and a 2.5Ghz Intel Core i7-6500U processor.

The 15-inch MacBook Pro is by far the most expensive machine, ringing up for $2,499 (£1,999, AU$3,799). However, for this kingly sum, it comes with double the RAM and SSD storage space, an AMD Radeon R9 M370X GPU, and it's the only one with a quad-core processor. Unfortunately, it has the lowest resolution display, pushing only 2,880 by 1,800 pixels.

If you're looking for something to serve your basic mobile computing needs, then the Dell XPS 13 is your smartest and most economical choice. However, if you're looking for something flashier and can do more, then the Surface Book is your ticket. For those who need a production workhorse, the 15-inch MacBook Pro still wins this race against Microsoft.

With a dedicated GPU, naturally the first tests we conducted were gaming ones. The Clipboard and its Skylake processor have more than enough power to make Hearthstone fly, even at full resolution. Plugging the display into the keyboard base unlocks even more performance from the dedicated GPU. With the discrete graphics chip in tow, the Surface Book can play Rocket League at 30 frames per second (fps) in full screen and medium settings.

For more ‘hardcore’ games, like Metal Gear Solid: the Phantom Pain, we were able to get it running between 24 and 29 fps, but only after dropping down to 1080p and practically turning off every setting. Microsoft’s first laptop won’t be replacing the best gaming PCs any time soon, but it’s surprising how well this machine gets along with only 1GB of VRAM.

Of course, all this power also makes the Surface Book a productivity beast that easily takes on task after task. Lightroom runs incredibly fast on this 13-inch laptop, thanks to the added power of the Nvidia graphics. What's more amazing is we’re able to edit photos quickly while having a browser full of 10 tabs and streaming video pushed over to a connected monitor.

Surface Book

Benchmarks

Here's how the Microsoft Surface Book performed in our suite of benchmark tests:

  • 3DMark Cloud Gate: 7,285; Sky Diver: 6,089; Fire Strike: 1,868
  • Cinebench CPU: 301 points; Graphics: 32 fps,
  • GeekBench: 3,166 (single-core); 6,635 (multi-core)
  • PCMark 8 (Home Test): 2,336 points
  • PCMark 8 Battery Life: 3 hours and 58 minutes

The Surface Book has broken all sorts of benchmark speed record, thanks to its hot new Intel Skylake and Nvidia GeForce chipset. Just in terms of processing power alone, it's 301-point Cinebench score is significant jump compared to the Dell XPS 13, which ran with a last-generation Broadwell Intel Core I5 chip.

Thanks to the extra boost from the discrete graphics chip, the Surface Book also has more than double the performance for gaming. This is evidenced by its 1,868 point Fire Strike score compared to the Dell's 739-point performance.

The only figure we could draw to compare this machine to the 15-inch MacBook Pro is the GeekBench score. In the multi-core test, Microsoft's laptop finished with 6,635 points, whereas two outlets saw the 15-inch Apple's steely steed completed the test with an average of 14,258 – an unsurprising result, considering the MacBook Pro has twice the number of processor cores.

Surface Book

Pixels to please

With 3,000 x 2,000 pixels under its belt, the Surface Book sits at a happy middle ground of being sharper than most other laptops (including every MacBook in existence) without the troubles that plague 4K screens. You'll never see the separation between the pixels, l because they're so tiny, and Windows 10 scales beautifully at 200%.

While most applications, including the Origin, Steam and Battle.net launcher would look tiny on a 4K screen, these windows look small, but not uncomfortably so, on the Surface Book.

We even like the 3:2 aspect ratio. The ability to read more lines of text and not have a Lightroom window that's not vertically squished together more than makes up for the thick black bars that appear when you watch movies. Microsoft fashions its displays after A4 paper, which makes the Clipboard feel like a natural device for writing and art work.

Surface Book

Within five minutes of handing the Surface Book over to an artistic friend, who works as a designer in the fashion industry, she was already drinking the Kool-Aid. According to her, using the Surface Pen is incredibly accurate, and the screen gives just enough to the point where it emulates the feel of painting and drawing on real paper.

Now that Microsoft has started to patent new versions of the Surface Pen, complete with haptic feedback functionality and a touch-sensitive retention clip, we’re curious how else the company plans to improve upon its winning stylus in the future. For the time being, however, we’re admittedly satisfied by the 4,096 pressure sensitivity levels of the most recent Surface Pen. Should it get better, it would only be icing on an already delicious cake.

Sadly, the speakers don't make as big of an impression and really only sound good enough for some casual listening. While they avoid the problem of being tinny, as most laptop speakers are, they also lack any depth with barely any bass. If you're looking to settle down for a movie or a quick game, you'll want to plug in a pair of headphones.

Surface Book

Battery life

Battery life on the Surface Book is both pretty good and surprisingly disappointing. While Microsoft has promised 12 hours of continual usage and other outlets report getting even more juice out of the machine, our best time for the device was 7 hours and 39 minutes. As for the Clipboard on its own, the tablet can last for 4 hours.

While these are more than respectable numbers considering all the hardware inside the Surface Book, we honestly expected a much longer run time. The good news is this notebook recharges quickly, going from zero to 100% charge in under two hours.

This could largely be due some problems early Surface Book owners are running into. Our unit seems to be among this group of afflicted models. Just some of the major bugs include the system not starting up properly when connected to the dock and display driver failures. The latter of which cause battery life to drop dramatically by three or more hours.

Microsoft has said it is "aware of aware scenarios where Surface Book's display may deliver a display driver error and that we'll address through fixes issued via Windows Update within a few weeks after launch."

By comparison, the older generation Dell XPS 13 lasted for 7 hours and 40 minutes, while several outlets were able to stretch their usage of the most recent 15-inch MacBook Pro for an average of 9 hours and change. So again, the Surface Book's battery life is by no means terrible, but it could get a lot better with future updates.

Now, the question is: has Microsoft made the ultimate laptop? And the answer is not quite – not quite yet, anyway. The Surface Book still has some growing pains to get through, and its substantial size may not jive with everyone. However, this is a great first crack, and it's made the concept of 2-in-1 laptop look and sound more believable than anyone else has.

The majority of hybrid laptops to this point have followed the back-flipping model established by Lenovo's Yoga series. This is largely because models with detaching screens were clunky and chunky, but Microsoft has turned the perfected the concept by splitting the laptop in half.

All the essentials for a Windows 10 tablet are packed into the Clipboard, which can be used as Surface tablet unto it's own. But then the slate marries perfectly with its other half that contains extra batteries and a dedicated GPU.

We liked

The Surface Book's design isn't for everyone, but I simply fell in love with its futuristic look. Whether it looks odd or just ahead of the curve will depend on your perspective, but you can't deny Microsoft has made a daring move with its dynamic fulcrum hinge. 2-in-1 laptops – and especially those of the detachable variety – have had their ugly duck moments. This is no such moment for Redmond.

Beyond looks, every design element of this laptop is full of purpose, from the rolling hinge to how quickly you can detach the Clipboard. The Surface Pen and the display work together beautifully for creating art that I will never understand beyond jotting down my notes in chicken scratch. And then there's the Surface Book's undying performance that just won't let up whether you're working on spreadsheets, editing photos or even enjoying some light gaming.

We disliked

While we praise this hybrid for its incredible performance, there are heavy limits on just how many games it will play with only one gigabyte of video memory. The early bugs are also something I can't ignore, but they're to be expected from the first run of the first laptop ever created by Microsoft.

Though some small parts of the Surface Book experience are borked as of this writing, you can bet Microsoft won't be resting on its laurels. Updates will continue to come out quickly one after the other and just in the time of one week, we’ve already received two software patches that have fixed a few of my early problems with the device.

Final verdict

If you were to strip away the Clipboard's ability to detach, the Surface Pen, the neatness factor of the dynamic fulcrum hinge and just about everything that makes the Surface Book unique, you would be still left with terrific laptop. That's what we love the most about this device. Underneath all the extra stuff, the Surface Book is a solid laptop in terms of ergonomics, performance and, yes, even battery life despite the promises.

Incorporating all the extras – from the ability to run off with the clipboard, the incredible accuracy of the Surface Pen and the engineering feats of the hinge – they all serve to enhance the experience, rather than detract. In time, Microsoft will smooth out all the rough edges of its first go. Both the Dell XPS 13 and 15-inch MacBook Pro are well worth purchasing in their own right. But if you want an excellent laptop that does just a bit more, then the Surface Book is your ticket.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/1G07if9

Razer DeathAdder Chroma

Razer has a reputation for creating some of the best PC gaming hardware. Some gamers swear by the brand and buy nothing but their products. But not everyone is in love with Razer’s often garish, neon-green designs.

However, Razer’s latest peripheral, the Deathadder Chroma, is a mouse that anyone can get into. Whether you’re a claw or a palm grip user, it’s a brilliant mouse. The biggest style addition to this mouse is the subdued customizable lighting system that sets the Chroma apart from the competition.

And, now that Black Friday and Cyber Monday are right around the corner, you can have this fantastic gaming mouse at a low price, making an already great peripheral even better.  

Design

The Razer DeathAdder Chroma shares the same dimensions as the regular Razer DeathAdder - 5 x 2.76 x 1.73 inches (L x W x H) Don't worry about slipping with this mouse, as it's made out of a nicely textured hard plastic with grippy rubber on the sides, as well as the scroll wheel.

Razer DeathAdder Chroma review

The front of the mouse is formed into a concave, natural "W"-shape that allows for the perfect amount of finger space and does a great job of supporting the palm without fatiguing the wrist.

On the mouse you'll find five buttons: the standard right and left click buttons, a scroll wheel that functions as a third button, and two programmable buttons located on the left side of the mouse. The programmable buttons feel quite natural, and have been designed to have the same actuation as the main left- and right-click buttons.

Last but not least is the the IR optical sensor that delivers an outstanding 10,000 dpi.

Software and customization

While the mouse itself is great, Razer’s software (while being easy to use) can get sluggish, and the use of cloud computing rather than native memory for the mouse is an odd move. However, the mouse doesn’t necessarily need the proprietary Razer drivers to work, but you’ll need them to customize the mouse. What’s worse is finding the drivers on Razer’s website is convoluted and could really use an auto detect feature.

Synapse itself is a fairly robust customization program. It features Razer's typical design structure, and allows multiple users to each create their own profile, which is handy for those who have to share a computer. Razer also uses the cloud so users can access their settings from different computers. However, it seems a bit intrusive to expect users to install Synapse on every computer that they want to use the DeathAdder Chroma on if they want to keep their customized settings on the go; built-in memory would've been a better way to go.

Synapse offers plenty of options for users to change their sensor sensitivity, pointer acceleration and polling rate as well as the lighting for the mouse. Each LED can be set either together or independently and colors can be set to cycle through a set of hues with Spectrum Cycling, set to a single shade which can pulse or remain steady, or synced to other Razer Chroma devices for uniformity.

Razer DeathAdder Chroma review

Synapse can also be used to calibrate the mouse's optical sensor to be optimized to a particular surface, including a Razer mousepad or another surface, a function we first saw on the Logitech G502. Synapse is also used to set macros which can include any combination of keys or mouse clicks and can be assigned to one of the two customizable side keys.

Final verdict

The Razer DeathAdder Chroma isn't revolutionary or a huge improvement over the previous entries in the DeathAdder series, but it is a great barebones mouse for those who wish to have the quality, comfort and accuracy of a gaming mouse without all the flash.

The software is usable and for the most part fairly unobtrusive, but suffers from a bit of slowdown. The cloud computing features could be taken either as a pro or con depending on the user's preferences and usage - though, in all honesty, on-board storage would've made more sense. It won't affect those who only use their mouse on one computer, but those who game or work on various computers may find having to re-download and install Synapse multiple times to be a bit of a hassle.

Overall, this DeathAdder Chroma is great for the price ($69.99 about £40, AU$80) and is a fantastic entry-level gaming mouse for those who are either just getting started with PC gaming, or those who don't need or want the glitz and potential headache of the more expensive gaming mice.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/1p1oitn

Nubia X has a main display with super slim bezels, secondary OLED screen on its back

As many phones move to offer slimmer bezels and edge-to-edge screens, there has been the problem of what to do with the front-facing camera. Some phones have stuck their selfie camera in their chin, some have embraced the notch, and some have opted for a sliding form factor. The new Nubia X does something a bit different.

The Nubia X features a large display on its front with super slim bezels and a secondary display on the back of the phone to help you take selfies. As you can see in the video below, there's a functional display on the back of the device that can help you take selfies or just function as a regular screen. The main display is a 6.26-inch 2280x1080 screen, while the secondary display is a 5.1-inch 1520x720 screen.

The software on the Nubia X will try to predict which display you're looking at, but there are also dual fingerprint readers — one on each side — that'll let you manually change screens if you press them both at the same time.

In addition to functioning as a secondary display for things like selfies, you can also use the OLED screen on the back of the Nubia X to display dynamic photos or a clock. And when you're playing a game on your Nubia X, the main screen can show you the gameplay while the back screen can give you two extra buttons.

Nubia X game controls

The back of the Nubia X is also home to a dual rear camera setup that offers 16MP and 24MP sensors. These cameras offer features like phase detection autofocus, AI scene recognition, and 240fps slow-mo video capture.

Inside are specs that you'd expect from an Android flagship in 2018. There's a Snapdragon 845 processor, up to 8GB of RAM, up to 256GB of built-in storage, and a 3800mAh battery. There are dual fingerprint readers on the Nubia X, one each side, and you can touch them both to switch between the front and back screens. On the software side, the Nubia X runs Android 8.1 Oreo below a custom Nubia 6.0.2 user interface.

The Nubia X starts at 3299 yuan ($473 USD) for the model with 6GB of RAM and 64GB of built-in storage and tops out at 4299 yuan ($616 USD) for the 8GB/256GB model.

Nubia's way of solving the front-facing camera problem with full-screen phones by just skipping the front camera and putting a display on the back is an interesting one. Rear cameras are typically higher quality than front cameras, so the Nubia X's setup should result in better selfies, especially since you'll be able to see yourself while you use the rear cameras. The always-on display feature of the Nubia X's rear screen could come in handy, too.

What do you think of this design?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2Pth2sf
via IFTTT

Mekamon V2

It’s less than a year since we reviewed the first iteration of Mekamon – a spider-like robot designed to battle others of its kind, or virtual enemies in augmented reality via a smartphone app. Think Pokémon in real life and you’re most of the way there.

Mekamon V2 is available in white, black, and a fetching new grey camo pattern. The camo is exclusive to Apple Stores, but all robots are compatible with both Android and iOS. It’s also backward compatible, so V2 bots can battle their V1 counterparts without any trouble. Mekamon’s creator, UK-based Reach Robotics, says it intends to continue supporting its older models, so you don’t need to worry about your bot becoming obsolete when V3 struts into stores.

Design

The robot itself looks very similar to its predecessor, with four limbs (each with three joints), detachable armor plates, and a pair of removable ‘guns’ atop its torso. The main difference is the light within its head, which now glows different colors to indicate its mood.

If you lose a battle, or remove a piece of the robot’s equipment, it turns red and stomps angrily just to make sure there’s no confusion about its displeasure. Clip the accessory back on, or emerge from battle victorious, and it will glow green while bobbing with enthusiasm.

The original Mekamon was solidly built, and its predecessor is even more robust – which is just as well, as some of its ‘death’ animations involve the machine stiffening and toppling over on its back. In fact, animations have been improved across the board, giving Mekamon V2 more personality (and sass) than its predecessor. You can even create your own – more on that in a moment.

Companion app

When you first load the Mekamon app, you’ll be presented with a short comic-book style video summarizing some new lore, followed by a menu featuring three options: Play, Create and Discover. Discover is currently greyed out, but will eventually serve as a download center where you can find content made by other robot owners. Reach Robotics hopes to have it up and running soon, and will roll it out as a free update once it’s ready.

When you launch Create mode – a new addition for V2 – you’ll find two sections: MekaMotion and MekaCode.  The latter is currently unavailable, but will hopefully be unlocked before Christmas. When complete, it will let users create programs for their robots using blocks of pre-written code. This will be particularly useful for kids learning to code, and for schools that have invested in a Mekamon for teaching, or received one as a donation (education is a key priority for Reach Robotics’ founder Silas Adekunle).

Another new addition is Mekamotion, which lets you download and create new animations for your Mekamon. In this mode, you can gently position the robot’s legs like a clay stop-motion figure, then use the app to ‘capture’ each pose as a frame of animation. When ‘unlocked’ for animation (individually or in groups), the legs take on a kind of waxy flexibility, allowing you to bend them gently and then remaining in their new position until changed manually. Frames can be copied and pasted if you want to repeat a motion. 

Sometimes you’ll have to support the Mekamon’s body to achieve a particular effect, and it feels like the process might be easier if the legs were a little stiffer (sometimes the machine sags a little after being posed), but it’s a novel idea that works well on the whole. To get an idea of what’s possible, there’s a selection of pre-made animations to download, including twerking, a dab, and enthusiastic tail-wagging to make just a few.

Play and fight

Selecting Play mode gives you two options: Freedrive and Skirmish. Freedrive lets you get a feel for operating the robot, and provides various options for tinkering with its movement, including speed, step height and more. Mekamon V2 moves faster than its predecessor, and there’s far less latency between you operating the controls and the robot responding.

One of the biggest differences for Mekamon V2 is that the robot no longer requires a specially marked map to orient itself. Just set it down (it works fine on hard floors and carpets) and it’s ready to use immediately in Create or Freedrive mode

Before starting a Skirmish, you’ll need to spend a moment walking around with your phone to map out a battlefield. As you move, the floor will be covered with a pattern of squares on your phone’s screen, showing the area where the fight can take place. It’s not perfect, and can be foxed by objects like low tables, but it’s much more convenient than the mat and generally works well.

Before entering battle, you’ll be prompted to choose a loadout. Each of these involves a different configuration of shields and guns, and comes with different properties, such as speed and types of attack.

The robot is steered using two on-screen ‘joysticks’  – one controlling its movement (forward, backward, left or right) and the other changing the direction in which it faces. It’s best to start by standing directly behind the robot, but the movement soon feels natural. To attack, ensure your Mekamon is facing its enemy (real or virtual) then tap and hold the weapon controls. Be careful, though – fire too often in rapid succession and your Mekamon will ‘overheat’, necessitating a cooldown period before you can resume battle.

Conclusion

Mekamon V2 is great fun, and although it's lacking some features at present, most of those are software-based and will be added with future app updates. There's great potential here to get kids interested in coding, and sharing their own creations.

Although it certainly isn't cheap, it's impressive that Reach Robotics has managed to knock down the starting price from the first robot's initial tag of $299.95 (£299.95, around AU$535). The commitment to backwards compatibility is also reassuring.

Mekamon is stocked in Apple Stores throughout the US and UK, so if you're not sure whether to invest you can head over and try one out on the shop floor. Just don't blame us if you're still there making the robot twerk when it's time for the staff to lock up for the night.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2OgwIKH

iOS 12.1.1 beta 1 update released by Apple

iPhone XS Max hands-on video

Now that iOS 12.1 is available to the public, Apple has begun beta testing its next iOS release.

Apple today released iOS 12.1.1 beta 1 to registered developers. If you're a dev, you can install the update by going into Settings > General > Software update or by downloading it from Apple's Developer Center.

Details on what's included in this update are light, but Apple does say that iOS 12.1.1 brings "bug fixes and improvements." That may not sound super exciting, but hey, having a smartphone that is less buggy and works more smoothly is a good thing, especially since many people rely on their phone for entertainment, communication, snapping photos, and more.

It's unclear when iOS 12.1.1 might be released to the public, but expect at least a few more beta releases before the full rollout begins.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2Q8ENCY
via IFTTT

Top 10 Android Apps of October 2018!

We've compiled a top 10 list of our favorite Android apps to hit the Play Store in October 2018. The apps highlighted in this video include Niagara Launcher, Fluid Navigation Gestures, Hooky Crooky, Rootless Launcher, Tapete, Badland Brawls, SW True-Fi, POCO Launcher, Feedly Lab, and Flippy Knife. Which app is your favorite?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2Q8Fa0k
via IFTTT

Spotify giving family plan subscribers a free Google Home Mini

Google Home Mini hands-on review

Spotify Premium subscribers on a family plan are about to get a nice gift.

Starting tomorrow, November 1, Spotify Premium for Family plan subscribers can get a free Google Home Mini. Just go to this page on Spotify's website tomorrow and you'll be able to claim your free Google Home Mini if you're the master account holder for your Spotify Premium for Family plan.

This offer will be available through December 31, 2018.

The Google Home Mini allows you to play music from Spotify using your voice by saying things like "Hey Google, play Spotify" or "Hey Google, play 'Call Me Maybe' by Carly Rae Jepsen". You can also play, pause, skip forward or backward, and like or dislike songs using your voice.

This is a pretty nice offer for Spotify Premium for Family plan subscribers. The Google Home Mini may be Google's entry-level smart speaker, but it's still a capable device that can answer questions, control smart home devices, play music, and more. It's also a nice move for Google, as it gets one of its smart speakers into more homes.

For more on the Google Home Mini, you can check out our video review right here.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2CTvrHp
via IFTTT

Apple pauses watchOS 5.1 update following complaints of bricked watches

Apple Watch Series 4 hands-on

One day after Apple began pushing the watchOS 5.1 update to Apple Watch owners, the rollout has been halted.

Apple has paused the watchOS 5.1 update following reports on Reddit and Twitter that it was bricking some Apple Watch Series 4 devices. Users say that when they try to install the update, the Apple Watch just gets stuck at the screen with the Apple logo.

“Due to a small number of Apple Watch customers experiencing an issue while installing watchOS 5.1 today, we’ve pulled back the software update as a precaution,” Apple told TechCrunch. “Any customers impacted should contact AppleCare, but no action is required if the update installed successfully. We are working on a fix for an upcoming software update.”

The update doesn't appear to be bricking every Apple Watch Series 4 device, as some folks say that they installed it without issue. Still, it's a good move for Apple to stop the rollout of watchOS 5.1 to prevent any more watches from getting bricked. Stay tuned and we'll let you know when a new, non-bricking update is released.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://www.phonedog.com/2018/10/31/apple-pauses-watchos-51-update-following-complaints-bricked-watches
via IFTTT

Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM

There's a decent selection of lenses out there for users of Sony Alpha cameras who like to shoot wide-angle images – provided they like zooms. Primes, though, are a bit thin on the ground, with Sony not offering anything wider than the FE 28mm f/2. 

That all changes with the arrival of the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM lens, an all-new wide-angle prime lens that sits at the top table of Sony's lens line-up on account of its G Master designation. 

Features

  • Features two XA elements
  • 11-blade circular aperture
  • New linear AF motor

With the focus on optical quality throughout the aperture range, the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM sports an optical design that features two of the company's XA (extreme aspherical) lens elements, as well as three ED glass elements. 

The inclusion of the two XA elements is designed to control Sagittal flare. What's that you ask? It's a phenomenon that results in an unnatural spreading of point light sources, such as stars, that looks something like a bird spreading its wings, and it becomes more pronounced towards the image periphery. 

It's more common with large-aperture lenses, and it's something that can be a plague to astrophotographers, with clusters of stars often looking like flocks of birds in images captured at wide apertures. 

The FE 24mm f/1.4 GM also features Sony's Nano AR coating to suppress reflections that can lead to flare and ghosting, while it should be possible to shoot images with creamy-smooth bokeh thanks to the 11-blade circular aperture.

The FE 24mm f/1.4 GM is also the first Sony lens to feature a Direct Drive SSM (DDSSM) linear motor, which is designed to offer a combination of fast response, high positioning accuracy and quiet operation. 

Build quality and handling

  • Weighs just 445g / 15.7oz
  • Dust and moisture resistant 
  • Aperture ring

Considering the clever optical design, Sony's engineers have managed to make the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM weigh in at just 445g (15.7oz). That's quite a bit lighter than its main rivals, and the lens balances really nicely on the Alpha A7R III we tested it with. 

The lens is also nicely made, and features a fluorine coating to help prevent finger prints, dust, water and oil marking the lens, while it's also dust and moisture resistant. 

There's a decent-sized manual focusing ring at the front of the lens that enables a good degree of control, while towards the rear is an aperture ring. While you can set the aperture manually, if you prefer to adjust this via the camera's command dial you can select the 'A' position on the ring, and this shouldn't be easily knocked out of place, with enough friction to prevent any unwanted movement. You can also choose whether to enable or disable the aperture ring click stops – handy if you're shooting video. 

On the side of the lens is a useful customizable focus hold button, which can be customized in the camera's menu, while there's also a dedicated AF/MF switch. 

Focusing was very swift in our tests, and incredibly quiet – we were really impressed with the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM's precision and performance, especially when used in conjunction with the brilliant EyeAF mode on the A7R III. 

Performance

  • Excellent resolution
  • Smooth bokeh wide open
  • Vignetting appears well controlled

This FE 24mm f/1.4 GM certainly doesn't disappoint. The lens delivers excellent image quality, with impressive levels of sharpness out to the corners of the frame and good levels of contrast; even wide open at f/1.4 the lens is lovely and sharp. 

Expect to see a hint of chromatic aberration (purple/green fringing), but we've found this to be very well controlled and its presence can be reduced in post-processing. 

The FE 24mm f/1.4 GM also delivers some beautiful bokeh, with a pleasingly smooth transition from in-focus to defocused areas. Vignetting in also well controlled, and while there's a hint of it at f/1.4, it's handled pretty well, and doesn't detract from the image. This really is a lens that's just at home shooting wide open as it is stopped down. 

Verdict

If you've been holding out for Sony to launch a wide-angle prime lens, you won't be disappointed with the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM. It's a lovely lens that's been engineered to such a level that it should still deliver the goods on future generations of Alpha full-frame cameras. 

Lightweight and well-made, it captures stunning detail and beautiful bokeh, backed up by fast focusing and polished handling. 

This all comes at a price though ($1,400 / £1,450), with the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM costing more than twice as much as Sigma's very capable 24mm f/1.4 DG HSM | Art lens. If you've got deep pockets, you won't be disappointed.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2prAgj3

Apple Watch 3

MSI Trident X

The MSI Trident X is a small machine that packs in a surprising amount of new technology. Gaming grunt comes from one of Nvidia’s new Turing graphics cards, and processing power is delivered by one of Intel’s brand-new Coffee Lake-S processors.

Those are formidable core components, but the Trident X isn’t cheap - it’ll set you back $3,700 (£2,900, AU$5,200).

Price and availability

The $3,700 (£2,900, AU$5,200) MSI Trident X is only available in the configuration that we’ve reviewed here, which is a little irritating – we would have preferred a pricier model with the RTX 2080 Ti, and a more affordable machine with the RTX 2070 wouldn’t have gone amiss either. 

MSI could also include lesser CPUs for those who aren’t fussed about having a high-end, eight-core chip.

It’s also worth remembering that buying from a local builder will save cash. If you opt for a smaller machine from a company like Chillblast or CyberPower then you can save a few hundred pounds or dollars. 

If you’re willing to have a full-size tower, you’ll probably save a little more – and net yourself a bigger motherboard with more features and more upgrade room across the whole PC.

Design

The Trident X is a narrow, eye-catching system, with glowing RGB LEDs and angled panels. The front has full-size USB ports and a handy Type-C connection, and the Trident’s 14.3 pound (6.5kg) weight means it’s relatively easy to carry to gaming events.

It’s larger than the older MSI Trident 3, but it is smaller and lighter than two other key rivals – the MSI Aegis 3 and the Alienware Aurora R5 were heavier and chunkier. It’s also a lot smaller than a full-size gaming PC.

One side of the machine is dominated by the graphics card. It stretches across the whole width of the system, with meshed areas in the side panel to aid airflow. Below that you’ll find the rear of the motherboard, and the Samsung M.2 SSD.

Behind the opposite side panel are more components. Here you’ll find the storage, motherboard and power supply, along with the majority of the cables. The cabling and large, low-profile 120mm CPU cooler means that it’s difficult to reach the motherboard, and the only expansion option is a 2.5in drive bay - and it’s tricky to use because MSI hasn’t installed a SATA cable.

This is a not a machine to buy if you want to tweak and change your specification, but that’s the same with every mini-ITX PC - including rivals. It's an inevitable compromise.

The other issue is build quality. The plastic slats on the top are flimsy, and the side panels are made of relatively thin metal. The tempered glass panel that MSI includes in the box is stronger, but we’d still be careful when taking the Trident to gaming events.

Intel inside

The Core i7-9700K is one of Intel’s new Coffee Lake-S chips. These parts retain the same architecture as last year’s Coffee Lake chips, but with notable changes to core counts and clock speeds.

The i7-9700K has eight cores, but no Hyper-Threading – so it’s configured differently than the i7-8700K it’s replacing, which had six cores with Hyper-Threading. It makes sense, because native cores will always function better than the artificial Hyper-Threading system – and hardly any consumer applications need more than eight cores or threads anyway.

The i7-9700K runs at 3.6GHz, which is 100MHz slower than the i7-8700K. However, the i7-9700K’s eight cores hit 4.6GHz on Turbo, with one core topping out at 4.9GHz. The older chip could only manage 4.3GHz across all cores and 4.7GHz on one core.

The MSI Trident 3 and Aegis machines use Core i7 chips from the Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake ranges – so you get fewer cores, but with Hyper-Threading. The Alienware Aurora also uses Coffee Lake.

Performance

The Coffee Lake-S chip inside the new MSI is superb. Its Cinebench score of 1,470cb is almost double the pace of the MSI Trident 3 and Alienware machines, and it’s more than 300 points beyond the MSI Aegis 3 and its Core i7-8700.

The gap was maintained in Geekbench 3. The Trident X’s single- and multi-threaded results of 5,868 and 27,594 are stellar. The MSI Aegis 3 is the nearest challenger, and that was five hundred points behind in the single-threaded test and four thousand points back in the multi-core benchmark.

Having eight cores without Hyper-Threading but with better Turbo speeds clearly gives Coffee Lake-S the edge when compared to six-core chips that are Hyper-Threaded. That’s because eight native cores will perform better in applications than six cores that are handling twelve threads. That’ll make a real difference in day-to-day use, where few applications – or even groups of applications -  need twelve threads to function well.

The Coffee Lake-S won’t bottleneck games, and it’ll handle day-to-day computing with ease. It’ll also run the vast majority of productivity applications, from video editing to streaming and content creation. The only software that won’t run well are tools that need proper workstation CPUs.

The factory-fresh CPU is joined by an Nvidia Turing graphics card. Despite its name, the RTX 2080 is designed to replace the GTX 1080 Ti. It has the new architecture’s improvements to integer, floating point and shader performance, and it includes a mighty 2,944 stream processors, 8GB of GDDR6 memory and a clock that starts at 1,515MHz and boosts to 1,710MHz.

It’s a great specification, but a question mark still hangs over Turing because of its headline features. Ray-tracing won’t work until Microsoft’s DX12 update arrives, and super-sampling needs to be implemented on a game-by-game basis.

Nevertheless, the GPU is no slouch. It zipped through our conventional 1080p tests with averages beyond 100fps in Deus Ex and Middle Earth: Shadow of War. The RTX 2080 has the power to handle 4K gaming, too: it ran through those two games with 4K averages of 40fps and 57fps.

It’ll play today’s top games at 4K, on widescreen panels and on VR headsets. The RTX 2080 may struggle with 4K gaming in the future or with graphics settings turned up in a handful of games, but you’re rarely going to hit issues.

The RTX 2080 destroys the GTX 1070 and GTX 1070 Ti cards that are used in most small form-factor gaming PCs. The Turing card scored 9,950 points in the 3D Mark Time Spy test. That’s nearly 4,000 points better than the GTX 1070 and about 3,000 points quicker than the GTX 1070 Ti.

Despite the power on offer from the CPU and GPU, the Trident X never performed badly in thermal tests. Its peak CPU and GPU temperatures of 81°C and 67°C are absolutely fine, and the MSI never proved loud – it produced a modest rumble that’s easy to mask with speakers or a headset.

The rest of the specification is fine. The Samsung PM981 SSD is reliably fast, with read and write speeds of 3,361MB/s and 1,906MB/s – quick enough to deliver rapid boot and load times. The 32GB of DDR4 is enough for work and overkill for games, but its 2,666MHz speed is mediocre. 

The components attach to a modified version of an MSI Z370i Gaming Pro Carbon motherboard that has been stripped of its RGB LEDs and snazzy heatsinks – not an issue in a PC that’s so locked-down.

Verdict

The new components deliver formidable performance. The Turing GPU pelted through games benchmarks with enough grunt for 4K and VR gaming, and for playing titles at extremely high refresh rates. It’s only going to get better as driver updates appear and the new features arrive.

The Coffee Lake-S CPU outpaces its predecessors while delivering enough power for almost every task, and the rest of the specification is fine.

The chassis is small and smart, with good thermal performance, plenty of ports and RGB LEDs. That makes it an ideal system for taking to LAN parties.

However, while the Turing GPU is fast, its headline features don’t yet work – and these cards remains a risk. There’s no way of knowing whether ray-tracing and super-sampling will transform games – or not be properly utilised.

Elsewhere, the MSI Trident X doesn’t have the best build quality. There’s little room to upgrade on the inside, which is cramped and crammed with cables.

The price is high, too. If you don’t need quite this much CPU or GPU power, it’s very easy to save money by opting for a machine with lesser components – and they’ll still handle games in the majority of resolutions and situations.

Overall, the MSI Trident X’s new components deliver exceptional speed in all situations – certainly more pace than we’ve seen from mini-ITX machines in the past. The rest of the specification is fine, and there isn’t much that this machine can’t do. The chassis looks good, and it’s cool and quiet.

Build quality is suspect, though, and there’s no room to grow here. It’s expensive, too. However, if you’re feeling flush then there’s no better way to get your hands on a small PC with a shedload of computing ability.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2RogzVx

Jive

In a world that seems to be always connected, it’s easy for companies to become complacent in their use of technology, falling behind along the way. Take the desk phone, for example, an ageing concept in and of itself that some would argue no longer has a place in our offices.  

Once tethered to the same copper wire tech invented back in the late 19th century, it should come as no surprise that landlines are fading into obscurity. After all, now we all have phones in our pockets that are capable of so much more than taking analog phone calls. If our smartphones power the world, why aren’t we using them as our primary means of communication in the workplace? Why settle for the rather limited desk phones when you can opt for a pocket phone that runs apps and stores files in the cloud, no questions asked?

Well, one of the biggest concerns stacked against advocates for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) programs is security. It’s crucial not only that we have the flexibility we need to work efficiently in an office environment, but that we also don’t let classified company information slip through the cracks. For that reason and more, PBX (Private Breach Exchange) phone systems exist as a safe middle ground between using old school landlines in the workplace and haphazardly letting employees use their personal smartphones for business.

Because PBX phone systems are cloud-based, they can integrate with smartphones to provide Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services to your staff independent of the device that they’re using. In theory, these VoIP providers are there to make it possible for users to start one task on their desk phone and resume it later on their smartphone, laptop or desktop computer. Among those involved in the VoIP market is Jive Communications, a company owned by remote desktop software developer LogMeIn.  

Unlike some competing VoIP services, which include everything from RingCentral Office to Microsoft Skype for Business, Jive is dead focused on its mission to improve VoIP security. Complete with end-to-end encrypted “Jive Secure” calling that extends to virtually any device you use it with, Jive wants to ensure that you can identify every last piece of hardware connected to your company network in order to prevent the spillage of internal materials discussed over telecommunications.  

But that’s not where the functionality of Jive starts and ends either. Join us as we run down all the unique features that Jive has to offer while also exploring the various pricing options you can choose as you consider deploying one of the top VoIP services at your organization. Let’s take a look.

Features

Pricing and features

First off, the price. The cost of Jive for your business depends entirely on how many people will need to take advantage of its many features. More specifically, pricing is based on the number of “seats,” presumably at your office, that’ll be using Jive.  

If that number is between one and four seats, Jive is at its most expensive – $29.95 (£23.40) per month per user. If you need Jive at five to nine seats, the cost gets lower, at $25.95 (£20.27) while 10 to 24 seats will set your company back $23.95 (£18.71) per seat per month. Next up, get Jive for 25 to 29 users and you’ll be forking over $21.95 (£17.15) per seat every month. Lastly, 50 to 99 seats commands a price tag of $19.95 (£15.59) a seat each billing cycle.  

Jive also claims that “special pricing” is available for any business that calls for more than 100 Jive seats, perhaps indicating a slightly lower cost, though you’ll have to sit on the phone with a Jive customer service rep to find out for sure.

One of the best parts about Jive, as opposed to bigger name rival services like RingCentral Office or 8x8 Virtual Office Pro is that no matter what price you pay, you’re getting the same features. While those aforementioned VoIP providers have pricing tiers that raise and lower the amount of functionality employees can take advantage of, Jive is a one-size-fits-all solution. With it, you can bank on a long list of features (over 80, according to Jive), some of which we’ve yet to see elsewhere.  

Hero

You can peruse the full list here, but to summarize, Jive offers an auto-attendant, virtual fax, call recording, custom hold music, call parking, call forwarding in addition to call center-specific features such as wait time announcement and agent login/logout. More mundane, but highly necessary, features are also in place, such as speed dialing, call waiting and number porting for migrating over your existing PBX hardware should you make the switch to Jive.  

Unique features, like Whisper, which lets administrators discreetly give agents instructions while they’re on the phone speaking with customers, are also included at no extra charge. Jive even integrates with CRM services like Salesforce, Zoho and Redtail.  

Final verdict

It goes without saying that we are impressed with what Jive brings to the table. Instead of divvying up features into exclusive pricing tiers, the cost of Jive to your company is based on sheer volume of employees. The higher the number of employees in the office, the more likely you are to benefit from Jive’s various subscription plans.  

Stuffed with a wealth of useful knick-knacks, Jive is a feature-packed VoIP PBX phone system that has a great deal more to show for its accomplishments than a run-of-the-mill mobile app – it’s an excellent value made possible by a business model that every VoIP provider should adopt. Oh, and for a limited time, every Jive seat is entitled to a complimentary GoToMeeting Pro License, in case HD video conferencing is part of your workflow.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2OYYJMb

Tuesday 30 October 2018

How important is display resolution to you?

Apple iPhone XR

Smartphones continue to get better and better, tweaking the formula and improving upon what's come before. Processors, the amount of RAM offered, speakers, and displays. Just the nature of things, and here we are in 2018 and we've got a ridiculous number of smartphones out there that are impressive in their own way.

What actually matters to you when comparing these devices, especially if you're looking to spend some money and buy a new handset, should really only matter to you. What someone else wants in their device might not be the exact same thing you do. And even if you're both interested in the best possible camera, you may not even agree with someone which phone has that.

And then maybe you don't want "the best" of something, just because it exists.

That decision may be getting a bit easier these days, too, with smartphone prices shooting up into the $1,000 range. It may be worth taking a bit more stock of what you actually want and need from your smartphone. Not necessarily what you might do with it, but what you actually do with it on a regular basis.

That's what I'm running into today. I'm not even really sure why, but this morning I was second-guessing my purchase of the iPhone XS Max. A friend of mine had told me that I should go with the blue iPhone XR because, for one, it's not as expensive (and maybe saving money isn't a bad thing?), and because it's blue. And I want a blue iPhone. At the time I just said that I couldn't go back to an LCD screen, because OLED. And maybe that's still true on some level.

But honestly? I probably could go back to an LCD screen and be perfectly fine with it. Because while it's great that the iPhone XS Max supports HDR and has a sharp resolution, I don't really need any of that. I don't watch full-length movies on my phone. I actually barely watch movie trailers or music videos on it. Sure, I'll watch video shared on social media, but even then it's not like it's long enough to warrant the HDR support or increased resolution.

Apple's Phil Schiller recently said, "If you can't see the pixels, at some point the numbers don't mean anything. They're fairly arbitrary," in an interview. I know that made a lot of people scoff and call him out, but I don't think he's wrong. Is there a difference in quality between the OLED panel and the LCD panel in the iPhone XS Max and the iPhone XR? Of course. But I'm just not thinking it's worth the price difference anymore.

I've said for a long time that the camera is the most important part for me when I'm looking for a phone. That means I'm basically switching between iPhones and Pixel smartphones, and I'm fine with that. But I think I'm starting to realize that I don't want, or need, the sharpest displays anymore just because I don't really take advantage of it.

But, what about you? Is the screen resolution on your smartphone one of the most important aspects of your handset these days? Let me know!



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2qi2366
via IFTTT
Back to top ↑
Connect with Us

    Popular Posts

    Powered by Blogger.

    Pages

    About

What they says

© 2013 techmobile. WP Mythemeshop Converted by Bloggertheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.