Friday, 1 June 2018

T-Mobile customers going to Russia for 2018 World Cup get unlimited high-speed data, calling, texting

T-Mobile logo MWC

The 2018 World Cup is about to kick off in Russia, and if you're a T-Mobile customer who's lucky enough to be making the trip, your carrier has a nice surprise for you.

T-Mobile has announced that it's giving free unlimited high-speed data, calling, and texting to its customers traveling to Russia for the World Cup. This offer runs from June 11th through July 20th and is open to postpaid customers. What's more, it's automatically applied, so you don't have to worry about adding it to your account before you fly to Russia.

T-Mo ran a similar offer earlier this year for the 2018 Winter Olympics, and so it's nice to see T-Mobile taking care of its customers that are going to Russia for the World Cup. T-Mobile One subscribers already get unlimited 2G data, but the high-speed data will be much more useful for sharing photos and videos and generally staying connected in a foriegn country.



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2J2EBpf
via IFTTT

Lenovo V330-15IKB

Motorola One Power shows off its notch in new photo leak

Motorola One Power photo leak

Days after renders gave us our first look at the unannounced Motorola One Power, the device has leaked again.

A photo that claims to show the Motorola One Power in the wild has made its way online. The device looks similar to the one that appeared in a render leak earlier this week, complete with a Motorola-branded chin and a display notch.

Unfortunately, this latest leak doesn't show the back of the Motorola One Power, which is rumored to include a dual rear camera setup, a Motorola logo that may double as a fingerprint reader, and Android One branding.

Little is known about the Motorola One Power's spec list, but rumors have said that the device will make its way to the U.S. The design of the phone is very iPhone X-ish, so the Motorola One Power could be an option for Android fans that like the look of Apple's flagship, especially since the Xiaomi is unlikely to bring its iPhone X-like Mi 8 stateside.

Based on what we've seen so far, are you interested in the Motorola One Power?



from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2sxYJEH
via IFTTT

Samsung HW-N650 soundbar

The HW-N650 is latest soundbar to emerge from Samsung’s state-of-the-art Audio Lab in California. The company’s investment in audio development has already paid dividends, with a number of very impressive soundbars launched over the last few years. This year sees Samsung build on that success with an entirely new range, and the N650 is the first to arrive in stores.

It includes many of the same features found on last year’s models, but adds Samsung’s new Acoustic Beam technology. Targeted at movie fans and gamers, this is intended to create a bigger and more immersive audio experience. If the N650 can deliver the panoramic soundstage that Samsung promises, then it might be just the ticket.

Design

The N650 uses a very similar design to previous Samsung models, with a simple rectangular shape and an all metal construction. The look is functional rather than eye-catching, but the build quality is excellent, with a solid feel and substantial weight.

This solidity extends to metal grilles at the top and front, along with a brushed metal finish to the edges and sides. The N650 is only available in black, but its stylish finish will match most modern TV designs; given its width of 1100mm, it should also complement larger screens.

However, despite being quite wide, the N650 also has a fairly low form-factor, with a height of just 560mm: this means it should fit in front of most TVs without blocking the screen. You also have the option of wall-mounting the soundbar, and Samsung include a dedicated bracket for that purpose.

On the front of the soundbar, over on the far right, there is a simple LED display. This lights up when you use the controls, and provides information on the volume, inputs and various settings. To the right of this display, on the end plate, are some basic controls for power, input selection and volume.

The provided remote is excellent, and a far cry from the credit card-sized controllers often included with soundbars. It’s well designed and comfortable to hold, with all the necessary buttons sensibly laid out, making controlling the N650 as intuitive as possible.

The connections are located in two recessed sections at the bottom of the soundbar. In the left hand recess you’ll find a USB port, a 3.5mm auxiliary audio jack, and an optical digital audio input. The right hand recess has an HDMI input, an HDMI output with ARC (Audio Return Channel), and a connector for the separate power supply.

Unlike many of Samsung’s recent soundbars, the N650 comes with a separate wireless active subwoofer. It measures 215 x 385 x 304mm (WxHxD), weighs 7kg and is designed to complement the soundbar itself. The two should pair automatically, and there’s a control on the remote to adjust the subwoofer level, ensuring the bass is nicely integrated.

Design TL;DR: The N650’s minimalist design and wide body will complement many large screen TVs, while the superb build quality and wireless subwoofer promise an expansive sound.

Features

The N650 uses a 5.1-channel speaker configuration, with a claimed frequency range of 42Hz to 20kHz and a total claimed power of 360W. There are three forward-firing channels, each composed of a mid-range driver and a tweeter. This configuration means the soundbar has a dedicated centre channel, which is important for dialogue in movies and narration in TV programmes.

Along with the three front channels, there are also two upward-firing channels - but this is where things get interesting. The N650 includes Samsung’s Acoustic Beam technology, so these upward-firing channels are composed of two pipes, each with 28 holes in them. Tweeters fire into these pipes, creating a series of acoustic beams emanating from each hole – a bit like the pipes in a church organ.

These beams head upwards and sideways, bouncing off the ceiling and walls to create a much wider, higher and more immersive soundstage. Although this technology isn’t new, and Yamaha has been doing something similar for years, Samsung’s approach is certainly unique.

As mentioned, the N650 comes with a wireless active subwoofer. This bass-reflex model uses a forward-firing 6.5-inch driver, coupled with a rear port to deliver decent bass extension.

The connectivity of the N650 looks good on paper, especially when you factor in the inclusion of Bluetooth. This not only allows you to stream music from your smartphone or tablet, but also receive wireless sound from a compatible Samsung TV.

On closer inspection, however, the connectivity isn’t quite as impressive, especially when compared to last year’s soundbars or the competition. To start, Samsung has dropped built-in WiFi, which means the N650 doesn’t support Samsung’s multi-room system and thus can’t run wireless rear speakers.

The number of HDMI inputs is also rather stingy considering the price, but you can always use ARC to send audio from the TV to the N650 via HDMI. In reality you’re going to have to do this, not only if you want to connect more than one HDMI source, but also if you want to enjoy the benefits of HDR.

For reasons best know to itself, Samsung has chosen to not support HDR passthrough, despite using HDMI 2.0 connections. This is a strange omission for a soundbar costing this much and aimed at movie fans and gamers, both of whom will probably want to enjoy HDR audio through their speakers.

The N650 supports the 5.1-channel versions of both Dolby Digital and DTS, but it can’t decode lossless formats and thus doesn’t support Dolby Atmos or DTS:X. This makes connecting all your sources to your TV, and then sending the audio back using ARC over HDMI, all the more logical.

If you’re a gamer, the N650 has a great little feature designed especially for you. Samsung’s 2018 TVs can detect when you select a connected games console, and automatically go into game mode. This extends to the soundbar, which will also automatically select a dedicated Game sound mode.

The N650 has three sound modes in total: Standard, Surround, and the aforementioned Game. The Standard mode just uses the front three speakers and is best for music and some TV programmes; the Surround mode is designed for movies and TV dramas; while the Game mode is obviously intended for gaming.

Features TL;DR: Samsung’s Acoustic Beam technology promises a larger and more immersive front soundstage, and is designed to enhance movies and games. There’s a decent set of features and connections too, although the absence of HDR passthrough is a mystery.

Performance

Samsung has been making some impressive strides in terms of sound quality, with last year’s MS750 being a particularly high watermark. So it was rewarding to discover that the N650 continues that trend, although in a slightly different fashion.

Whilst the MS750 was all about pure sound quality thanks to its front channels and distortion-cancelling technology, the N650 is more about spatial awareness. The Acoustic Beam technology really opens out the front soundstage, creating greater depth, width and height. It essentially generates a wall of sound that perfectly complements movies and games.

However within this immersive sound field, dialogue remains clear and focused, while effects are placed with real precision. The addition of a separate subwoofer gives the audio a solid foundation of bass, and these low frequencies are effectively integrated within the rest of the soundstage.

The sound modes work particularly well, with the Surround mode creating a more cinematic experience, whilst the Game mode allows you to focus on sound effects. So if you stick on a movie like Deepwater Horizon, you’ll find yourself diving for cover as the oil rig blows up. However, if you switch to a session of Star Wars Battlefront, then the N650 will immediately immerse you in a galaxy far, far away.

Thanks to the Standard sound mode, the N650 also sounds great with music. In this mode only the front three speakers are used, creating an excellent stereo experience. Detail retrieval is impressive, whilst the clean mid-range and effective tweeters combine with the subwoofer to deliver plenty of clarity and dynamism. The Samsung proved very capable of delivering the layered guitars and driving beats of Resistance is Futile by Manic Street Preachers.

Performance TL;DR: The N650 produces an impressively big front soundstage, that enhances movies and gaming by immersing the viewer. Dialogue remains clear and focused, whilst the bass is deep and well-integrated. It also sounds great with music, making this an excellent all-round soundbar.

Value

There’s no denying that the N650 sounds fantastic, and it has the size and build quality that goes some way towards justifying its £699 cost. There’s also a decent set of features and a wireless subwoofer, but the limited number of HDMI connections and lack of HDR support are simply bizarre at this price point.

Other soundbars to consider

If you like the look of the N650, then it’s definitely worth considering Samsung’s HW-MS750. This soundbar doesn’t have a separate subwoofer, but includes distortion-cancelling technology, upward-firing drivers, multi-room capabilities and HDR support. It sounds superb and comes in at the same £699 price tag.

Also in the same price bracket is the LG SJ9, which sports a similar level of build quality and comes with a wireless subwoofer. It’s also part of LG’s multi-room system, while including more HDMI inputs and can HDR passthrough. Best of all, it has upward-firing drivers that support Dolby Atmos, making the SJ9 a tough act to beat.

Verdict

The N650 is an excellent soundbar that boasts a solid build quality and a minimalist design, combined with a decent set of features. Samsung has stripped away some of the features from last year, and the lack of HDR support is curious, but the addition of a wireless subwoofer and Acoustic Beam technology helps justify the fairly hefty price tag.

The sound quality is excellent, with an open and immersive front soundstage that lends itself to both movies and music. It’s no slouch with TV programmes either, and the centre channel ensures dialogue remains crystal clear. Music also sounds great, making the N650 a superb all-rounder, and worthy of recommendation if you’re looking for a new soundbar.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2kIwBvc

Sennheiser CX 6.00BT Wireless Earphones review

Sennheiser has long held a pedigree for enabling people to bob their heads to great sound. Straddling the line between audiophiles and more casual listeners, the company aims to appeal to a wide range of listeners while maintaining a high standard of audio quality, and are always worth a listen. At this price, the CX 6.00BT only add to the intrigue.

There is a barebones quality to these Bluetooth wireless earphones we could appreciate. Sennheiser likes to look a little slick with its products, but that’s not the takeaway we got after listening to tunes on these.

The CX are made for the everyman out there: affordable enough to be a worthy upgrade from a cheaper pair that went bust, yet at a price point that suggests great value. They won’t be for everyone, but we generally liked what we saw - and heard.

Design

It’s clear the leading design principle was in cutting down the CX’s weight. At only 49 grams, these were among the lightest pairs we’ve ever tested. 

The other standout feature was the small-sized earpieces housing the drivers. If bulky earphones have caused you grief before, that won’t be a problem here. Both earpieces feature contoured frames with a slightly pinched appearance, and which should feed easily into your ears. Though the restricted size is perhaps unusual for a pair of earphones, those with ears on the smaller side should appreciate the sleeker build. 

The earphones are an unassuming black, with navy blue buttons and some light silver detailing. They are plastic, but don’t feel overly cheap, which is really what we would expect from Sennheiser anyway.

That being said, we would stop short of proclaiming these as winners of any beauty contest. The CX 6.00BT are a bit like their name – basic and somewhat unassuming. 

The cable connecting both sides is pretty standard, with an inline mic, playback controller and battery charger on the right side. A clip helps choke up any slack to keep them from dangling or falling, but we didn’t have much of a problem either way.

The four sizes of eartips should ensure any pair of ears can manage here, though if none of them suffice we would recommend considering Comply Foam tips - which deform to a point where they can better passively isolate noise. We tried them to gauge performance, but also managed fine fine with the included gel eartips.

It would’ve been nice if Sennheiser included a pouch or case to carry the CX 6.00BT around, but instead, you only get the bulky plastic case the earphones ship in, which we weren’t particularly keen on using on-the-go. If you have a pouch from an older pair lying around, use that. If not, you may have to invest in one separately.

Connectivity

Keeping things simple out of the box, Sennheiser puts the CX 6.00BT in pairing mode right away. We swiftly paired them with two phones – one iPhone and one Android device. The earphones support pairing with two devices simultaneously, meaning you can listen to music on one, while then taking a call on the other, for example.

A built-in voice assistant confirms a connection or disconnection, along with incoming calls and battery level. The earphones prioritize the source device sending audio over, though it wasn’t simple to regain a connection once it had been lost. We had to reboot the earphones to re-establish the wireless connection, causing a minor nuisance. Thankfully, that didn’t happen often.

Cutouts were very uncommon, in fact. Sennheiser says the CX’s range is a good 30 feet, and our tests seemed to confirmed this. Unless obstructed by a wall or similar, the connection was steady within the recommended distance. We could walk around a small apartment without really losing the signal.

The CX 6.00BT does support both AAC and aptX, as well as aptX Low Latency. That covers both iOS and Android software, but in the latter case, Low Latency support means video syncs particularly well with the audio. We concur with that, finding little to complain about when watching clips on YouTube, shows on Netflix or playing games.

Performance

The fit is crucial to discerning how these sound. Otherwise, it becomes much easier to write them off. We say that because it took us trying a few of the eartips to get the right feel. Smaller earpieces changed how we positioned them, simply because there was more wiggle room.

By default, the CX 6.00BT skew toward treble, with slight sibilance on cymbals and vocals. Bass is potent, albeit restrained enough to allow some balance. It was the mids that felt the emptiest, though not without some recourse.

Sennheiser’s free CapTune app is a playback and EQ tool made to add customization for select headphones in the company’s lineup. The CX 6.00BT are among them, and we wasted no time sussing out what we could do.

There are presets based on the genre of music you’re listening to, with the option of extensive customisation on the EQ. On top of that are bass and treble boosters, with sliders to control how far prominent you want these frequencies to be. Tinkering with them helped flesh out a more balanced sound for us, where hip hop, rock and jazz could sound equally resonant in their own way. 

It’s great to have these options, but there’s a catch: we could only use it with tunes stored on our devices or through the Tidal streaming service. The CapTune’s additional features were lost when trying to connect the app to Spotify, Google Play Music, Apple Music or any other option. On the plus side, the app can natively play MP3, AAC, WAV, FLAC, OGG, AIFF and Apple Lossless files, if you have them on your phone.

We were impressed with the overall clarity of whatever we played. Streaming from an unsupported source, like those we mentioned, still sounded good, if a little flatter. We found we had to raise the volume more often when compared to listening via CapTune. 

Passive noise isolation is decent enough once sealing things up, but we weren’t able to block out all the ambient sound around us. Riding on the subway, the train was audible in the background, forcing us to raise the volume further. 

Call quality was superb on both fronts. We surprised people on the other end when revealing we were using earphones, and came away impressed at the clarity of their voices, too. Again, in noisier environments, calls might be more challenging, but the inline mic’s noise cancellation worked like a charm.

Battery life

Rated at “up to 6 hours” per charge, we would say it’s closer to five, especially because of how much we had to raise the volume. That’s far from impressive for a pair of wireless earphones, but we can excuse it to a degree because of the price point.

The good news is we were able to get two hours of playback after only a 10-minute charge, and a full battery after 90 minutes.

Final verdict

We would hesitate to recommend these outright for bass lovers. Maintaining a good seal does the job of bringing out the lows, but these aren’t quintessential bass-heavy earphones. They’re more even-keeled and pretty agnostic towards all genres.

We’d also caution against using them in the gym excessively, because there’s nothing sweatproof going on here. These are best used for everyday commuting, light workouts or whenever the mood strikes to listen to tunes wirelessly. 

And you can’t go wrong with the $100 price tag. While it is a tighter race to zero than ever before for wireless earphones, we think Sennheiser did enough to stand out with a good pair in the CX 6.00BT. So long as you get some use out of CapTune, you should come away pleased with the sound on offer.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2svOil2

Less expensive iPhone X for 2018 leaks with 6.1-inch screen, notch

With its edge-to-edge OLED display, Face ID, and glass body, the iPhone X is a pricey flagship device. Rumors have suggested that Apple is working on a less expensive version for 2018, though, and today the rumor mill has churned out images of what that phone may look like.

This new iPhone has a design similar to the iPhone X, according to renders from OnLeaks and MySmartPrice, complete with an edge-to-edge screen and a notch at the top of it. The screen is said to be a 6.1-inch display with 19.5:9 aspect ratio, which is slightly larger than the iPhone X but the same aspect ratio.

The overall design of this leaked iPhone is similar to the iPhone X, right down to the button placement. This model is said to be a around 0.6mm thicker, though. There's reportedly a glass back for wireless charging support, too.

Low cost iPhone X image leak

One notable change made to this phone involves the rear camera. Yes, that's rear camera as in one, which is one less than the dual rear camera setup on the iPhone X. Because this is iPhone is rumored to be a less expensive model, it wouldn't be a surprise to see it offer a single rear camera.

It's unclear what this iPhone might be called or how much it might cost when it launches, but rumors have suggested that it'll be introduced in September alongside Apple's other new iPhone hardware. If today's leak proves accurate, this iPhone could be a nice option for all the folks who thought the iPhone X was too expensive, giving them a design largely similar to the iPhone X but in a more affordable package.

Does this rumored iPhone interest you?

Low cost iPhone X image leak front

7WKK_P6qc7g


from PhoneDog.com - Latest videos, reviews, articles, news and posts https://ift.tt/2xyVQJt
via IFTTT

Victrix Pro AF Gaming Headset

Victrix is a new competitor in the gaming headset field, and it’s coming in hard with a solidly built, pro-focused piece of kit in the Victrix Pro AF ANC. The idea behind the headset was to meet professional tournament players’ needs by using the best technology for the job. And, a lot of that technology happens to involve aircraft-grade engineering.

With a commitment to superior built and features, the Victrix Pro AF ANC doesn’t avoid a high price. It’s base price is $299 (about £225, AU$400), though a pre-order discount has made it temporarily $199 (about £150, AU$265). 

The high price puts it in an uphill battle against some of our picks for best gaming headphones. The SteelSeries Arctis Pro (with GameDAC) comes with a high-quality build and a load of features for $249 (£249, AU$389). The Beyerdynamic Custom Game headset is also premium quality at a still lower premium price of $209 (£179, AU$249).

So, while the Victrix Pro AF ANC headset offers a solid build and easy usability, its commitment to being the best eSports headset stands in the way of making it a solid recommendation for most gamers who don’t regularly play in arenas. 

Design

The Victrix Pro AF ANC headset is designed for tournament gamers, and it definitely has the gamer aesthetic. It pairs a mix of matte and glossy black parts with purple accents galore (happens to perfectly match my OnePlus 5 and case). The cable is purple and shows around more of the headset, and the earcup interiors are purple. An X shape on each earcup features purple lighting, with simple options: on, off, or pulsing.

The headset has a stainless steel headband with two leatherette-covered cushions. The aircraft-grade aluminum yolks slide through diecast housings that allows them extend to a desired length and also swivel about 90 degrees to lay the headset flat around your neck. The yolks don’t tuck away when they’re not extended, which gives them a curiously Batman-like look.  

The earcups are made of a glossy black plastic that doesn’t lend itself to the rest of the premium feel. The soft, leatherette-covered memory foam earpads are comfy and roomy. Strong magnets hold the earpads in place, but make them easy to remove as needed. Altogether the headset feels great to wear, without too much weight or pressure in any one spot.

The metal used in the headset feels strong, and offers plenty of flex, but a plastic bit that allows the yolks to slide and swivels feels like a weak point.

Victrix Pro AF Gaming Headset review

A key feature of the Victrix Pro AF ANC is the lever on each earcup that opens up a ventilation gap, so gamers ears can breathe and cool off. It’s a simple mechanism and works effectively. A clever trick is that opening the earcups automatically suspends active noise-cancelling, helping save some battery.

The microphone is dazzlingly flexible, with a soft rubber coating over the metal arm. It has a pop/hiss filter at the end, and a noise shield with space for custom logos. The microphone and audio cable connect to the headset with an unfortunately large connector.

The Victrix Pro AF ANC comes with an in-line control unit, but since the headset aims to follow tournament rules and connects to computers and consoles via a 3.5mm jack, that control unit is battery powered. In other words, it’s heavy and clunky, and easy to accidentally leave on (though the headset’s basic feature still work without power). It’s also awkward with both the in and out cables stemming from the same side. 

Lastly, the OLED screen on it falls on the dim side, making it harder to see in bright settings.

Performance

Let’s start with the good: the microphone. The 6mm bi-directional noise-cancelling mic is based on the design used in the Cobra attack helicopter, and it cleanly presents our voice. The ability to monitor the mic and adjust the gain using the in-line controls is handy (though the mic monitor sounds a tad echoey). Our teammates said we sounded weird at first, but when we recorded a sample, it was apparent that they just weren’t used to how we really sound. 

The rest is a bit of a mixed bag. 

When gaming, the audio is generally clear, and the soundstage open enough to pick up which direction sounds are coming from. While we could use this to our advantage and handily win deathmatch in Overwatch, something about the EQ balance seemed to make gunshots and footsteps in Fortnite sound further away than they actually were. Switch to PUBG, and the problem went away.

Listening to music, we can really sense the different EQ settings. Naturally, the headset is high on the bass and weakens in the mids. The in-line controls provide two EQ settings, one balanced the low, mid, and high, while the other is pretty much the headsets default. Unfortunately, the bass feels too soft when using the balanced setting, but otherwise it drowns out the mids and highs.

The active noise-cancelling (ANC), though effective at blocking out droning background noises, curiously seems to cut out mostly bass tones. The noise-canceling feature would also still let some higher frequency noises come through. We tried it out on a balcony with cars driving by, and most of the sound was cut down, but it sometimes leaves us feeling like our ears need to pop.

Final verdict

The Victrix Pro AF ANC is a well-built, tournament gamer-focused headset. But, that commitment to gamers in tournament situations has meant a high price for features that won’t offer as much value to gamers everywhere else, and an aesthetic that’s only a fit for gaming.

There are cheaper headsets out there that offer solid mics, better audio a great build, and more features. Few might have comparable noise-cancelling performance, but unless you’re gaming in loud arenas often, the feature doesn’t justify the price tag.

If you have the money to spend on the Victrix Pro AF ANC, think about the SteelSeries Arctis Pro or Beyerdynamic Custom Game instead.  



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2H88cb7

Garmin Forerunner 935 review

There’s nothing better than training with a decent partner - and the Garmin Forerunner 935 promises it can be the very best that you can bring with you.

Whether it’s through extended battery life, more activities tracked than you can shake a stick at or just a strong watch that will stick with you through thick and thin, the Forerunner 935 could be one of the top running watches on the market.

That said, it’s also pretty expensive - so is this the right device for the casual fitness fan, or is it only the purview of those taking on an Ironman-level challenge?

Garmin Forerunner 935 price and release date

  • Out now
  • Price starts at £450 / $500 / AU$700

The Garmin Forerunner 935 release date was mid-2017, coming to the market in readiness for the Ironman season. It’s now been on the market for over a year, but the prices haven’t plummeted hugely in that time.

You can buy the Forerunner 935 for £450 in the UK, or £569 if you go for the ‘tri’ bundle (which gives you the triathlon in-water heart rate monitor). Those same options can be had in the US and Australia for $500 / AU$700 for the basic package, or $650 / AU$850 for the more full-stocked tri-bundle.

Design and screen

  • Comfortable and easy to put on
  • 1.2-inch 240 x 240 display
  • Screen is visible even in sunlight

If you’re a fan of the Garmin range, then the look and feel of the Garmin Forerunner 935 won’t be that much of a surprise to you.

In essence, it’s the Fenix 5 - an incredibly powerful watch from Garmin that can manage to track all manner of things - in a more ‘Forerunner’ shell, with less hardened glass and metal and more sleek rubber all around.

It’s less of a fashion statement and more of a refined model - the metal buttons around the display are the most striking element of an otherwise anonymous design.

That’s not to say that it’s bad - the strap is a nice silicone option, which stretches nicely in between the lugs to sit comfortably on the wrist. It’s super easy to put this watch on, which is worth noting as it's oddly difficult with some other brands, who employ a ‘double band’ approach that you have to feed the strap into.

That’s not easy one-handed, but we’ve never had any issues with the Garmin watch falling off, even jumping in and out of water.

The underside of the Forerunner 935 houses Garmin’s heart rate monitor, which protrudes to stick into your skin a small amount. It’s not sharp at all and can’t really be felt - although you will be left with a temporary indentation when you take the watch off.

The screen on the Garmin Forerunner 935 is perfect for what you need - 64 colors, 240 x 240 resolution in the 1.2-inch round display. It uses transflective technology, which means that it’ll take the ambient light and reflect it back really well, making the watch always visible outdoors.

It’s just the right size to not be overpowering, but also allow you to see four data screens easily - so if you want to know how fast you’re going, for how long, the heart rate you’re working with and the time the sun sets, you can have that all on one screen.

It's not a touchscreen, but the buttons on the outside of the Garmin Forerunner 935, as mentioned, are metal and very easy to find and hit without looking - which is a key feature when you’re going to be jumping in water, onto bikes and sprinting around tracks with this device.

It’s a touch heavier than some watches at 49g, but that’s much lighter than the Garmin Fenix 5X and barely registers on the wrist if you’re used to wearing a running watch.

We’ve used the 935 as a day to day watch for months and found it to be compact enough to fit alongside a shirt or slip through a tight compression top sleeve - it might be pricey, but for the tech you’re getting in there it’s a good companion for most outfits if you want to have a top fitness watch ready to go at any point in the day.

Fitness

  • GPS can be slow to lock on
  • Heart rate monitor is accurate
  • Heart rate monitor can also tell you your performance condition

Right - let’s get onto the real reason you’re here: to find out how good this watch is for tracking running, biking and pretty much anything you want to throw at it.

One of the things that surprised us about the Garmin Forerunner 935 in terms of performance was the slow lock of the GPS signal - it’s one of the worst we’ve seen from the recent Garmin range.

It’s not terrible by any means, but most of the watches we test from Garmin either lock on within seconds or learn where they are well and pick it up quickly the next time.

The Forerunner 935 can leave you waiting for thirty seconds to a minute fairly regularly - it’s not that long and easy to manage, and sometimes it’s rapid, but we did have too many instances of being left out waiting in the rain and cold, and we expected better from a watch of this standard.

The heart rate monitor (HRM) is pretty darn accurate though - we found ourselves dropping the chest strap more often than not, as the wrist-based data was actually accurate enough to make decisions about how hard we were going and seemed to correlate well with actual raises and drops of intensity.

That HRM packs in some other decent tech too: performance condition. This watch can monitor how hard you’re working and correlate that with your heart rate variance, which is the difference between each heartbeat.

As you get more tired, your pulse becomes more uniform and the watch can tell you that in real time, giving you a literal number that explains how much effort you’ve got left in the system.

This can be a blessing and a curse: the days when you start running and you’re told your condition is ‘+4’ means you can go out and have a nice run, with loads of energy to burn.

However, start with a negative number and you’ll worry that you’re not going to have a decent time, especially at the start of a race.

Then again, knowing that you’re in ‘energy deficit’ is nothing more than a fact, and if you can run accordingly, giving yourself a breather or putting in more effort, you’ll have a nicer time overall by not pushing too hard and blowing up or leaving anything in the tank unnecessarily.

Running

  • One of the more accurate running watches
  • Lots of data available on customizable screens
  • Can alert you to whether you're above or below the pace

The run tracking on the Garmin Forerunner 935 is excellent. It’s really hard to actually fault it, as it does everything you want it to do and more.

For most of us, the main thing you want is just something that can show you the data you want - and there’s very little here that the 935 couldn’t pump out. Even if you’re a fairly elite-level runner, you’ll see some functionality in here that you’ll think is a bit above your station.

You can customize loads of screens, which you can cycle through with the up and down arrows easily, and see everything from pace, to time, to monitoring which foot is more dominant (with the chest strap or optional foot pod), to the time the sun is going to come up.

You can also set interval sessions from the watch itself, or create a dedicated workout in the Garmin Connect app on your phone and have it sent to the watch.

This is a really neat feature, as it means you can create structured training sessions (say, you want to do an interval session of longer and longer sections with rests in between over 10 miles at varying paces) and then just start them on the watch and let it be your coach.

When you’re putting in high effort, the thought of ‘am I running fast enough?’ isn’t one you want - and this watch will bleep to let you know if you’re above or below the pace.

It can do the same with heart rate as well, which is really useful if you’re looking to train smarter - and trusting in the wrist-based HRM makes it a cinch to just tap a few buttons and go.

We’ve used the Forerunner 935 in a number of races, including multiple marathons, and it’s generally one of the more accurate over long distances. Like most watches it’ll get a bit thrown out by high buildings or trees, but over the run we found it to be one of the more accurate options.

Our model did recently suffer a fatal freeze in the middle of a marathon, which was upsetting, but that was after many months of use and is quite anomalous according to a web search.

There’s a fairly robust buzz from this watch as well, which means if you’re looking to get an update on how fast you’re running each mile or kilometer the alerts are easy to feel, which isn’t always the case as some watch manufacturers make the vibration engine smaller to make the device more compact.

Cycling

  • Displays speed and cadence accurately and visibly
  • Can easily transition between triathlon stages
  • Can connect to a huge number of sensors

One of the best parts of the Garmin Forerunner 935 is that it’s capable of doing so much and tracking it accurately. With running, cycling, swimming, paddle boarding and even ‘Jumpmaster’ on offer, you can easily track yourself through most races.

Cycling is a big part of the triathlon scene, and while one might not want to have to keep checking their watch when cycling to see how they’re getting on - many will have a cycling computer for that - the ability to transition easily between stages is useful.

(There is a dedicated triathlon mode, but you can also join your own sets of activities together and create things like a duathlon with ease).

What impressed us most about the cycling mode on the 935 was the sheer range of sensors you can connect. Like running, there’s little to say about the capabilities of this watch with regards to cycling because it’s easily capable of displaying your speeds and distance accurately and visibly on the screen.

Take it further though, and you can connect lights, power meters and even cameras to the watch, firing them right from your wrist.

The Forerunner 935 is a good pal when inside on a static trainer too. We connected the watch to an expensive bike (a Planet X ex130e with Shimano 6870 di2 groupset) in a front room, where it sat on a TacX Satori Smart turbo trainer, which in turn connects to the PC under a TV to ride in the Zwift virtual world.

When we go to connect the watch to the turbo trainer, the number of sensors we can use is dizzying, including power, cadence and a whole range of other metrics.

After cycling in the Zwift mode, all our information from the ride was instantly logged in the Garmin app so we could see stats, and they were uploaded straight to Strava too.

Swimming

  • Not super accurate in the water
  • Can auto-detect stroke types
  • Lets you set drills and buzzes to tell you when to change things up

Even if you’re not a great swimmer, having a watch by your side can be really useful for post-workout analysis.

You can’t do much with the Forerunner 935 while you’re splashing away in a pool (apart from monitor the amount of lengths you’ve managed, which it’s not terribly accurate at, often missing a length at least in most sessions), and if you’re in anything smaller than 17 meters long then the Garmin can’t track you - so be warned, you’ll need to train somewhere properly.

It’s also capable of tracking outdoor swims, using the GPS, and while this could be a little shaky (we weren’t able to test in anything exposed to the sky) because the watch is plunging underwater so often and losing signal, if it’s anything like the others in the Garmin range we expect the 935 to be pretty good in the outdoor lakes of this world.

The Forerunner 935 is definitely a capable swim watch - you can set drills to know when you’re pushing and not, it can accurately tell you which stroke you’ve been doing in the post-swim debrief on the Garmin Connect app and can even monitor SWOLF, which is an amalgamation of stroke rate and time taken, to help give you an indication of how hard you’re working.

If you are doing drills, while you’re not going to be able to look at the watch mid-length, the haptic buzzing is really great underwater, making it easy to know when to change things up.

We weren’t enamored with the accuracy of the 935 in the pool, as the missed lengths were irritating, and it can’t tell you your heart rate from the wrist in this scenario, but the ability to know which stroke you were doing automatically and uploading all the info to Strava is really cool.

Strength and HIIT workouts

  • Inaccurate rep counting
  • Basic HIIT support

A more recent update to the Forerunner 935 is the addition of strength training, where it can monitor reps of what you’re doing in the gym while you lift heavy pieces of metal while glistening.

It’s pretty fully-featured too, with loads of exercises to choose in the Garmin Connect app, and you’re able to send them to the watch and have it tell you what to do for each set.

In theory it’s supposed to count how many, and you input in the weight (either in the app or on the watch) to record how well you’ve done.

It really doesn’t work well. The rep counting is often wildly inaccurate even if you lift ‘not too fast, not too slow’ as Garmin suggests, and the information on what you’re supposed to be doing in each set is very fleeting too, with no way to recall it.

It’s good that it suggests you do a warm up before you start, but it doesn’t go into depth about how you should do said thing - would it be too hard to just suggest some basic arm swings or similar to help a newbie get going?

We did find that some moves - like bench pressing, for instance - were easier to track than others, with things like pull-ups obviously being hard to track.

In short, the rep counting has far too many issues, but as a way to structure a workout, it’s pretty good. In Free Workout mode you get a rest timer too, so you can track how long you’re letting your body recover, so that’s useful.

Would we use this again for gym workouts? Only if we had a really technical workout and needed guidance throughout… but even then, we’d like to be able to remind ourselves how many reps or what weight we’ll need.

High intensity interval training (HIIT) is also supported on the 935, but only through the ‘Cardio’ app, which basically just tracks calorie burn. Yes, you can download others through the Garmin Connect IQ store (more on that soon) and we tried something called WorkItOut.

It was… fine. Star jumps, wall sits, planks were all there but nothing that really taxed, and the heart rate monitoring seemed rather inaccurate.

The Apple Watch range is now adept at monitoring your HIIT efforts, based on a smarter understanding of calorie burn in these scenarios, and we’d have expected Garmin to follow suit.

Garmin Connect

  • Garmin Connect lets you download watch faces and basic apps
  • Tracks sleep, steps, resting heart rate and stress
  • Allows you to get phone notifications on your wrist

The app which accompanies the Garmin Forerunner 935 is very strong, allowing you to monitor all manner of things and upgrade your watch with ‘apps’ and new watch faces.

The reason we’ve styled it as ‘apps’ is because these things are really rudimentary indeed, being things like the ‘WorkItOut’ exercise set mentioned previously, or alternative data screens to help you race better when running.

While these are good, you’re not going to get a huge amount from many of them without digging in hard to see what they can do, and it’s easy to give up and not bother after a short while.

It is cool being able to change the watch face though, and there are many nifty and customizable options out there.

What the Garmin Connect app does do well is… actually, nearly everything. You can track sleep, steps, resting heart rate and even stress with the Forerunner 935, and the latter is one that we got rather addicted to.

The great thing about the stress tracking is that it’s cumulative - yes, you can do things to help relax (and the 935 was recently imbued with a breathing meditative mode to help calm you, much like the Apple Watch 3… although not as good) but when it’s rising that will be because you’re around stressors.

Seeing it rise day after day tells you that something isn’t working out - are you sleeping well enough? (That can be tracked well within the app, so is easy to find out). Is work getting you down? Are your relationships healthy?

While it can be worrying in itself seeing your stress levels go up, being able to think why has been useful and forced us to rethink parts of our lives - when it starts to descend, you really feel like you’ve learned another thing about yourself.

There are a number of other cool features on offer here: connect your phone to the app and it’ll send notifications from your phone to the watch, and if you’re running or cycling with the phone in your pocket, it’ll use the data connection to ping your location to chosen loved ones using the LiveTrack feature.

Garmin could still do a lot more with this data, telling you what it meant in context and how to improve your life from it. That’s a criticism we’ve laid at the door of many manufacturers, but the fact Garmin seems to draw fairly accurate data makes it harder to take when it’s not used properly.

Battery life

  • Brilliant battery life
  • UltraTrac mode can extend it further but at the expense of accuracy

The battery on the Garmin Forerunner 935 is just out of this world. We managed to get 12 days’ use out of it, running nearly every day and having the watch connected to a smartphone and giving smart notifications on the wrist (such as messages, calls and WhatsApp missives) without missing a beat.

We asked a friend of TechRadar, who was about to do a huge duathlon, to test the Forerunner 935 to see if the stats bore out and they very much did:

“I started the watch on 90%, and it eventually died after 16 hours and 14 minutes. This was using the normal GPS mode with the heart rate monitor attached. However, I didn’t realize I’d left the Bluetooth mode on, which meant that during the cycling section I had my phone on to use the LiveTrack mode in my Garmin Edge 1000 cycling computer.

“This was also paired with the watch and drained some of the battery, and that’s probably the extra 46 minutes right there I would have needed to make the finish.

“Further savings would have been made if I wasn’t using the HRM, but this is a metric I’d rather have, especially in this type of event.”

The battery life was never something we worried about with the Forerunner 935, with a 17-20 mile run often only dropping between 10-20% of the battery, which is incredible given only recently these devices were three times the size and lasted a fraction as long.

We also tried the UltraTrac mode, an ultramarathon option where the Garmin Forerunner 935 will only ping the GPS every few seconds, thus saving huge amounts of power.

It’s terrible on accurate distance - we ran a half marathon with it, and it showed a race length of 14.1 miles - but at the same time it only dropped 3% battery from full, which was amazing.

Apart from some crazy models from China, the Garmin Forerunner 935 has the best battery life we’ve seen on a running watch.

Verdict

Is the Garmin Forerunner 935 one of the best running watches out there? No… it’s more. It’s arguably the best running, triathlon, cycling and hiking watch on the market, filled with all the sensors you’d want.

Want to connect smart lights from your bike? Done. Want to know how high you are up a mountain? Done, thanks to the barometric altimeter. Want to keep going for days and days and not pack a charger? Done… the battery life is insane.

There’s a lot to love about the Garmin Forerunner 935, and despite the understated design and the rudimentary interface, there’s little we wanted for from it.

The battery life, as mentioned, is the key selling point (along with the number of things you can monitor and analyze in the Garmin Connect app), and we were thoroughly impressed at nearly every turn.

Who's this for?

Look, let’s not beat about the bush: this is an expensive watch and it’s pointless unless you’re either a) training hard for a triathlon (or ideally an Ironman race) b) are desperate for excellent battery life or c) want to get the best out of sleep and stress tracking while maintaining a bit of points a) and b).

Otherwise, this will be a waste of money. Yes, it’s powerful, but you’d never get close to using it to its full potential, and there are a lot of cheaper watches that would suit you better.

Should you buy it?

As long as you’re not enamored by accurate swim or strength tracking, and can afford it, the Forerunner 935 is an excellent treat for most athletes.

It’s a little bigger than some fitness watches out there, but not by much, and for that you’re getting a fantastically powerful device.

The interface can be a touch slow at times, and like we said there are a couple of very, very small flaws in there, but for a smartwatch that can go, and go, and go… well, it’s hard to think of something better than the Forerunner 935.

First reviewed: May 2018

Not sold on the Forerunner 935? There are a number of alternatives, such as these:

Garmin Fenix 5X

The Garmin Fenix 5X is very similar to the Forerunner 935, in both price and performance. You’ll be really buying the ruggedized shell and the harder glass, as otherwise the functionality and fitness prowess is largely the same.

Garmin Forerunner 735XT

If you’re not sold on the cost of the 935, we’d instantly push you in the direction of the Garmin Forerunner 735XT, one of the best (and now, more affordable) watches on the market. It’s not got all the same fancy features, like stress tracking, but it does the rest very, very well and is one of our favorites to go running with.

Suunto Spartan Trainer Wrist HR

A slightly left-field choice if you’ve not heard of the brand, but it comes with excellent heart rate monitoring, and the app is capable of suggesting well-trodden routes around you. It’s a little chunkier on the wrist and things like sleep tracking are nowhere near as good, but this is a brand with a strong heritage in fitness tracking, and it shows.



from TechRadar: Technology reviews https://ift.tt/2HaqFUg
Back to top ↑
Connect with Us

What they says

© 2013 techmobile. WP Mythemeshop Converted by Bloggertheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.